Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Wilmington Morning Star
Editorial June 4, 1947

The Wilmington Morning Star

Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

The editorial contrasts U.S. criticism of anti-strike laws as fascist with a British Labor MP's proposal to ban all strikes, arguing they harm workers more, from labor's own ruling party.

Clipping

OCR Quality

100% Excellent

Full Text

In England-For Example
Here in America the proposal of national legislation to outlaw strikes imperiling public health and safety has been hailed in some quarters as the beginning of American fascism, a ruthless device of big business to destroy all labor unions, and a killing blow at the rights of man.
Over in England Alfred Edwards, a Labor member of Parliament, has called for legislation to abolish the strike weapon -- not just strikes that threaten public health and safety, but all strikes. His reason is that a strike "penalizes every one of the workers more than the employer at whom it is aimed."
Mr. Edwards, let us repeat, is a member of England's ruling party, labor's own party, which is pledged to advance labor's cause.

What sub-type of article is it?

Labor Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Labor Strikes Strike Legislation England Labor Party American Fascism Accusation Worker Penalties

What entities or persons were involved?

Alfred Edwards Labor Party (England)

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

British Labor Mp's Call To Abolish All Strikes

Stance / Tone

Comparative Irony Highlighting Labor Policy Differences Between America And England

Key Figures

Alfred Edwards Labor Party (England)

Key Arguments

American Anti Strike Legislation Seen As Fascism And Attack On Unions English Labor Mp Proposes Banning All Strikes Because They Penalize Workers More Than Employers Edwards Is From The Ruling Labor Party Pledged To Advance Labor's Cause

Are you sure?