Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Phenix
Domestic News February 16, 1839

The Phenix

Bristol, Bristol County, Rhode Island

What is this article about?

A lawsuit in New Haven, Connecticut, where a former Alabama clerk sued for damages after a letter accused him of being a violent abolitionist, leading to threats and his expulsion from the state. The jury failed to reach a verdict.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Novel Lawsuit.—An action was lately tried at New Haven, in the Supreme Court of Connecticut, in which the plaintiff, who had been a resident in the State of Alabama in the capacity of a clerk, demanded damages against the defendant for having written a letter addressed to the Postmaster of the place where the plaintiff resided, informing him that the plaintiff was a violent abolitionist, and advising the people of the place to treat him as he deserved, intimating that a coat of tar and feathers would not be amiss; in consequence of which letter the plaintiff was put in danger of personal injury, and was driven from the State, to the injury of his business.—The writing and receipt of the letter was proved, but the evidence of actual injury therefrom was not conclusive. The jury could not agree on a verdict.—Boston Adv.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Lawsuit Abolitionist Threatening Letter New Haven Connecticut Tar And Feathers

Where did it happen?

New Haven, Connecticut

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

New Haven, Connecticut

Event Date

Lately

Outcome

the jury could not agree on a verdict; plaintiff was put in danger of personal injury and driven from the state, injuring his business.

Event Details

An action was tried in the Supreme Court of Connecticut where the plaintiff, a former clerk in Alabama, demanded damages against the defendant for a letter to the local postmaster accusing the plaintiff of being a violent abolitionist and suggesting tar and feathers; the letter led to threats and the plaintiff's expulsion from the state.

Are you sure?