Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeGrant County Herald
Lancaster, Grant County, Wisconsin
What is this article about?
In the New York City mayoral election last Tuesday, Daniel F. Tiemann defeated Fernando Wood by 2,000 to 3,000 votes. Wood's loss attributed to public perception of his dishonesty despite his energy and ability. Wood endorsed by Washington Union, which called Tiemann's win a condemnation of democracy.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Eighty-three thousand votes were cast at the election last Tuesday in the city of New York for Mayor, wherein Daniel F. Tiemann beat Fernando Wood between 2,000 and 3,000 votes. The New York Times gives the following reason for the defeat of Wood:
Mayor Wood owes his defeat to the general conviction that he was a dishonest man. It is universally conceded that he has ability, that he has evinced more energy and executive vigor than has ever been seen in that office before, and that nothing but integrity was lacking to make him the best Mayor New York ever had. But the settled conviction of the public judgment is that he lacks this: that in his private business dealings, and in his administration of public affairs, he has been alike selfish, unscrupulous, unprincipled and corrupt. It was this conviction which destroyed him.
Wood was endorsed by the Washington Union, the organ of the Administration, which characterized the election of Tiemann as a 'verdict condemning the democracy.'
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
New York City
Event Date
Last Tuesday
Key Persons
Outcome
daniel f. tiemann beat fernando wood between 2,000 and 3,000 votes
Event Details
Eighty-three thousand votes were cast at the election last Tuesday in the city of New York for Mayor, wherein Daniel F. Tiemann beat Fernando Wood between 2,000 and 3,000 votes. The New York Times gives the following reason for the defeat of Wood: Mayor Wood owes his defeat to the general conviction that he was a dishonest man. It is universally conceded that he has ability, that he has evinced more energy and executive vigor than has ever been seen in that office before, and that nothing but integrity was lacking to make him the best Mayor New York ever had. But the settled conviction of the public judgment is that he lacks this: that in his private business dealings, and in his administration of public affairs, he has been alike selfish, unscrupulous, unprincipled and corrupt. It was this conviction which destroyed him. Wood was endorsed by the Washington Union, the organ of the Administration, which characterized the election of Tiemann as a 'verdict condemning the democracy.'