Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette
Domestic News June 26, 1832

The New Hampshire Gazette

Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

New Hampshire House of Representatives passes tariff modification resolutions introduced by S. C. Webster, despite opposition from Charles B. Goodrich and support from Col. Wilson; Senate approves unanimously. Commentary criticizes Mr. Goodrich's stance and quotes Journal of Commerce on Mr. Davis's federal woollens tariff proposal as excessive.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Tariff Resolutions.--On Friday last, some resolutions were introduced into the House of Representatives by Mr. S. C. Webster of Plymouth, expressive of the opinion of the Legislature favorable to a modification of the tariff. They were opposed by Charles B. Goodrich, Esq. of Portsmouth, who moved an indefinite postponement, and spoke at some length in support of his motion.

Mr. G. was backed by Col. Wilson of Keene, formerly the federal Speaker, who was somewhat lavish of his compliments on Mr. Goodrich for the course he had taken. Mr. Goodrich's motion was however negatived. and the resolutions passed by a large majority, and received the unanimous sanction of the Senate, [Mr. Henderson being absent.]

Mr. Goodrich is one of the professed Democrats elected at a second run on the amalgamation ticket in March last, and is just so far a representative of the party to which he professed to belong, as we had always anticipated, viz: from the teeth outward.

The Journal of Commerce says, the proposal of Mr. Davis of Massachusetts, to abolish the minimum system on woollens, and substitute for it a duty of fifty per cent on the value here, seems to be the neplus of ultra tariff madness. The value here, is made up of the cost, the charges of importation, the duty, and a profit on the whole.-- The duty on a cloth worth four dollars here, would be two dollars: the charges of importation perhaps 50 cents, leaving $1 50, with which to buy the cloth. Thus, under the name of 50 per cent would be actually imposed a duty upon the duty, amounting in all to 133 per cent. How under the present circumstances of the country, any man should be able to hold up his head and make such a proposition, it is difficult to understand.-- It can surely be intended for nothing but a naked insult to every feeling of conciliation. Its adoption would be equivalent to a total prohibition. In practice the scheme would be impossible.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Economic

What keywords are associated?

Tariff Resolutions New Hampshire Legislature Goodrich Opposition Davis Woollens Proposal Journal Of Commerce

What entities or persons were involved?

S. C. Webster Charles B. Goodrich Col. Wilson Mr. Henderson Mr. Davis

Where did it happen?

New Hampshire

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

New Hampshire

Event Date

On Friday Last

Key Persons

S. C. Webster Charles B. Goodrich Col. Wilson Mr. Henderson Mr. Davis

Outcome

resolutions passed by large majority in house and unanimously in senate (mr. henderson absent); goodrich's motion for indefinite postponement negatived. critique of davis's proposal as amounting to 133% duty, equivalent to prohibition.

Event Details

Resolutions introduced by Mr. S. C. Webster of Plymouth favoring tariff modification, opposed by Charles B. Goodrich of Portsmouth who moved indefinite postponement and spoke in support, backed by Col. Wilson of Keene. Motion negatived, resolutions passed. Goodrich described as professed Democrat. Journal of Commerce criticizes Mr. Davis of Massachusetts's proposal to replace minimum system on woollens with 50% duty on value here, calling it ultra tariff madness and impossible in practice.

Are you sure?