Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeGazette Of The United States
New York, New York County, New York
What is this article about?
Mr. Fox's noble motion on libels in the House of Commons praised Mr. Erskine's eloquence and advocated for press liberty, though unsuccessful. A Crown and Anchor meeting thanked Fox for pushing court reform inquiries.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The merits of Mr. Erskine on the subject of Libels were felt and admitted by the meeting at the Crown and Anchor, in their fullest extent; but as they properly directed their view to what Mr. Fox had so virtuously, though unsuccessfully attempted to accomplish—an enquiry into the practice of the courts, which would have opened the way to a complete reform of every error, they thought it right to confine their resolution of thanks to his motion only.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
House Of Commons
Key Persons
Outcome
mr. fox's motion was unsuccessful, but the meeting at the crown and anchor passed a resolution of thanks to him.
Event Details
Mr. Fox moved a bill on libels in the House of Commons, praising Mr. Erskine's earlier argument in the Dean of St. Asaph's case as a masterpiece of eloquence. He called upon the house to assert the Liberty of the Press based on its principles. A meeting at the Crown and Anchor acknowledged Mr. Erskine's merits but focused their thanks on Mr. Fox's attempt to inquire into court practices for reform.