Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Trainman News
Domestic News February 4, 1952

Trainman News

Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana

What is this article about?

Pennsylvania Gov. John Fine vetoed a bill increasing truck tandem weights, deeming the $25 overweight fine inadequate and questioning the strain on the state's $1.7 billion highway system amid material shortages, shocking the trucking industry.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Truck Bill Is Vetoed in Pa.

HARRISBURG -- Pennsylvania's Gov. John Fine, convinced that trucks are not paying their fair share of highway costs, has vetoed the "big truck" bill increasing tandem weights.

He termed "wholly inadequate" the $25 fine imposed by the bill in axle overweight cases.

The governor's action came as a shock to the trucking industry, reports a Philadelphia paper. The truckers have lobbied for years for what they called "weight parity" with other states.

Pennsylvania's governor saw it differently--he questioned the wisdom of submitting the state's $1,700,000,000 highway system to increased weights at a time when highway materials are in critically short supply.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Infrastructure Economic

What keywords are associated?

Truck Bill Veto Pennsylvania Governor Highway Weights Trucking Industry Material Shortages

What entities or persons were involved?

John Fine

Where did it happen?

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Key Persons

John Fine

Outcome

bill vetoed; shock to trucking industry

Event Details

Gov. John Fine vetoed the "big truck" bill increasing tandem weights, convinced trucks do not pay fair share of highway costs and terming the $25 fine for axle overweight wholly inadequate. The action shocked the trucking industry, which lobbied for weight parity with other states. The governor questioned submitting the $1,700,000,000 highway system to increased weights amid critically short highway materials.

Are you sure?