Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Springfield Weekly Republican
Editorial May 25, 1861

Springfield Weekly Republican

Springfield, Hampden County, Massachusetts

What is this article about?

The editorial defends the Lincoln administration against Jefferson Davis's accusations of bad faith in failing to evacuate Fort Sumter, arguing no such promise was made and that Davis initiated the assault to provoke war.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Jeff Davis Arraigning the Administration For Bad Faith.

Jeff Davis is evidently very uneasy in his mind. He still wants to argue the case. He is very anxious to make out a case of bad faith against the administration in the matter of Fort Sumter. He sent a supplementary message to his congress, the other day, elaborating this point, and bringing the evidence of ex-Judge Campbell, who was employed as a sort of confidential messenger between the southern commissioners and the administration, while the former were at Washington.

The charge is that the administration promised to evacuate Fort Sumter and did not. It might be a sufficient answer to this that the fort would have been evacuated in forty-eight hours if Jeff Davis had not ordered an assault upon it, because he needed actual war in order to save his conspiracy from perishing still-born.

But there is not a particle of evidence in the letters of Judge Campbell to Secretary Seward, published by Davis, that anybody ever promised the evacuation of Fort Sumter. All that Judge Campbell actually says is that after certain conversations with Mr. Seward, he (Campbell) assured the rebel commissioners that Sumter would be evacuated, and that no attempt would be made to reinforce it.

It is quite possible that Mr. Seward gave it as his private opinion that the fort would be evacuated. At that time everybody believed it would be. But the presumption of any pledge of that kind given to the rebels is preposterous, and Judge Campbell and Jeff Davis do not assert it.

But they charge duplicity in Mr. Seward and the administration because their expectation of the evacuation of Fort Sumter was not realized previous to the time when Davis determined to commence the assault on the fort. Davis needs a moral basis to stand on badly enough, but he does not find it here, and the fact that such an attempt is made should be a caution to Mr. Seward not to be too polite to traitors hereafter.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics War Or Peace

What keywords are associated?

Fort Sumter Jeff Davis Bad Faith Seward Evacuation Assault Civil War

What entities or persons were involved?

Jeff Davis Administration Judge Campbell Secretary Seward Southern Commissioners Fort Sumter

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Against Accusations Of Bad Faith In Fort Sumter Evacuation

Stance / Tone

Pro Administration, Anti Davis

Key Figures

Jeff Davis Administration Judge Campbell Secretary Seward Southern Commissioners Fort Sumter

Key Arguments

No Evidence Of A Promise To Evacuate Fort Sumter Fort Would Have Been Evacuated If Not For Davis's Assault Campbell Assured Commissioners Based On Conversations, Not Official Pledge Seward May Have Given Private Opinion, But No Formal Commitment Davis's Charge Of Duplicity Is Unfounded Caution Against Politeness To Traitors

Are you sure?