Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 3, 1880
The Holt County Sentinel
Oregon, Holt County, Missouri
What is this article about?
Editorial lambasts Democratic candidate Hancock and the Solid South as revanchist Confederates, praises Republican Garfield as successor to Lincoln, notes divisions in Vicksburg and Democratic defeat in Indiana.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
What must be General Hancock's feelings when he reflects that his election means the triumph of the men who fought with Lee and Jackson to destroy the Government?
Wade Hampton's speech frightened his party so badly that no doubt the most stringent orders will now be issued to every Confederate brigadier not to say what he thinks and believes until after election is over.
There is no reason in history for the Solid South. The excuses offered are false and frivolous. The Solid South is aggressive, and is the reappearance of the Southern Confederacy. The American citizen who does not know that fact ought to have a surgical operation performed on his head.
What does General Hancock think of Wade Hampton's candid avowal of the object of the "Solid South?" Doesn't he feel a little queer to be at the head of the party contending for the same principles for which Lee and Jackson fought? Can he look at the "Stars and Stripes" floating over Governor's Island without a blush?
The same elements which elected Lincoln to the Presidency in the face of the threats of the Secessionists of the South, reelected him in spite of Northern Copperheads declaring the war for the Union a failure, recognize in Garfield another Lincoln, whom they will this year elect to the Presidency in spite of the unreconstructed rebels of the Solid South, and their obedient, time-serving Copperhead allies of the North.
The Greenbackers held a meeting in the sacred Mississippi city of Vicksburg on the 21st, and there was a Democratic meeting on the same day. The double meeting had a tendency to divide the Solid South. Everybody didn't seem to remember that he was a Mississippian and owed allegiance to the Southern Confederacy through the Democratic party. Hence bloodshed and somehow or other the Greenback leader was shot.
To be compelled by the stress of circumstances to take a "Yank" as their candidate for the Presidency is no doubt disagreeable to the Southern Brigadiers, but should he be elected, they propose, as Bob Toombs says, to take their revenge in managing him, and should he prove less pliable to their purposes than they anticipate, they propose to run the machine themselves.
They are not toiling for the principles for which Lee and Jackson fought for nothing.
The Democrats admit that they have no hope of carrying Indiana in October. They have filed a petition asking the Supreme Court of the State to reverse its decision on the legality of the Constitutional Amendment, thus putting the election for Governor over to November. This is a confession of defeat, as well as a bitter satire on the judicial character of the Court. The petitioners virtually declare that they think the Democratic judges will decide anything the party wishes them to.
Wade Hampton's speech frightened his party so badly that no doubt the most stringent orders will now be issued to every Confederate brigadier not to say what he thinks and believes until after election is over.
There is no reason in history for the Solid South. The excuses offered are false and frivolous. The Solid South is aggressive, and is the reappearance of the Southern Confederacy. The American citizen who does not know that fact ought to have a surgical operation performed on his head.
What does General Hancock think of Wade Hampton's candid avowal of the object of the "Solid South?" Doesn't he feel a little queer to be at the head of the party contending for the same principles for which Lee and Jackson fought? Can he look at the "Stars and Stripes" floating over Governor's Island without a blush?
The same elements which elected Lincoln to the Presidency in the face of the threats of the Secessionists of the South, reelected him in spite of Northern Copperheads declaring the war for the Union a failure, recognize in Garfield another Lincoln, whom they will this year elect to the Presidency in spite of the unreconstructed rebels of the Solid South, and their obedient, time-serving Copperhead allies of the North.
The Greenbackers held a meeting in the sacred Mississippi city of Vicksburg on the 21st, and there was a Democratic meeting on the same day. The double meeting had a tendency to divide the Solid South. Everybody didn't seem to remember that he was a Mississippian and owed allegiance to the Southern Confederacy through the Democratic party. Hence bloodshed and somehow or other the Greenback leader was shot.
To be compelled by the stress of circumstances to take a "Yank" as their candidate for the Presidency is no doubt disagreeable to the Southern Brigadiers, but should he be elected, they propose, as Bob Toombs says, to take their revenge in managing him, and should he prove less pliable to their purposes than they anticipate, they propose to run the machine themselves.
They are not toiling for the principles for which Lee and Jackson fought for nothing.
The Democrats admit that they have no hope of carrying Indiana in October. They have filed a petition asking the Supreme Court of the State to reverse its decision on the legality of the Constitutional Amendment, thus putting the election for Governor over to November. This is a confession of defeat, as well as a bitter satire on the judicial character of the Court. The petitioners virtually declare that they think the Democratic judges will decide anything the party wishes them to.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
War Or Peace
What keywords are associated?
Solid South
Democratic Party
Confederate Legacy
Hancock Election
Garfield Support
Wade Hampton
Civil War
Partisan Politics
What entities or persons were involved?
General Hancock
Wade Hampton
Lee
Jackson
Garfield
Lincoln
Bob Toombs
Southern Brigadiers
Solid South
Democratic Party
Greenbackers
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of The Solid South And Democratic Party's Confederate Ties
Stance / Tone
Strongly Anti Democratic And Pro Republican
Key Figures
General Hancock
Wade Hampton
Lee
Jackson
Garfield
Lincoln
Bob Toombs
Southern Brigadiers
Solid South
Democratic Party
Greenbackers
Key Arguments
Hancock's Election Would Triumph Men Who Fought With Lee And Jackson To Destroy The Government
Wade Hampton's Speech Reveals Solid South As Reappearance Of Southern Confederacy
Solid South Is Aggressive With False Excuses
Democrats Aim To Manage Or Control Hancock If Elected
Republicans Will Elect Garfield Like Lincoln Despite Southern Rebels And Northern Copperheads
Greenback Meeting In Vicksburg Divided Solid South Leading To Violence
Democrats Admit Defeat In Indiana And Seek To Delay Election