Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 29, 1806
Berkeley And Jefferson Intelligencer
Martinsburg, Berkeley County, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial from Philadelphia critiques British admiralty courts' hostile decisions on neutral commerce, blaming the US non-importation act for worsening relations with Great Britain and diminishing respect for American policy.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
PHILADELPHIA, August 14.
Neutral Commerce. We understand that by some recent decisions at Halifax, it appears that the British admiralty courts have adopted a new principle still more hostile to Neutral Commerce, namely that the produce of enemy's colonies going to the mother country shall be taken and confiscated without inquiring whether it be the property of enemies or friends. Such is the substance of the intelligence which we have received from a source which may be relied upon. The particulars are promised us to morrow.
We would now inquire whether this is one of those blessed fruits which were to be produced in such abundance by that most wise and sagacious of all regulations called the non-importation act. Before the passage of that law Great Britain appeared to have some vestiges of respect for this country still remaining, and we were every day told, that according to the representations of Mr. Monroe speedy and equitable adjustment of all our differences might be expected as from the moment that the passage of that law was known in England, all those promising hopes have vanished into thin air. After all the declamation, which had appeared in the American papers against the conduct of Great Britain after the high tone which was used in the message of the president at the opening of the session of congress; after the war speeches, which resounded within the walls of the hall of representatives, and echoed to the remotest corners of the United States, and even across the Atlantic; and finally, after the truckling land buying policy which was adopted with respect to France and Spain: that all should wind up with such a pitiful piece of spite against Great Britain was enough to bring upon us the contempt of all the world, and was directly calculated to invite increased injuries from that power to whom we had shown this petty resentment at the very moment of proclaiming, in effect, that we either could not or durst not adopt any measure of efficient opposition.
Neutral Commerce. We understand that by some recent decisions at Halifax, it appears that the British admiralty courts have adopted a new principle still more hostile to Neutral Commerce, namely that the produce of enemy's colonies going to the mother country shall be taken and confiscated without inquiring whether it be the property of enemies or friends. Such is the substance of the intelligence which we have received from a source which may be relied upon. The particulars are promised us to morrow.
We would now inquire whether this is one of those blessed fruits which were to be produced in such abundance by that most wise and sagacious of all regulations called the non-importation act. Before the passage of that law Great Britain appeared to have some vestiges of respect for this country still remaining, and we were every day told, that according to the representations of Mr. Monroe speedy and equitable adjustment of all our differences might be expected as from the moment that the passage of that law was known in England, all those promising hopes have vanished into thin air. After all the declamation, which had appeared in the American papers against the conduct of Great Britain after the high tone which was used in the message of the president at the opening of the session of congress; after the war speeches, which resounded within the walls of the hall of representatives, and echoed to the remotest corners of the United States, and even across the Atlantic; and finally, after the truckling land buying policy which was adopted with respect to France and Spain: that all should wind up with such a pitiful piece of spite against Great Britain was enough to bring upon us the contempt of all the world, and was directly calculated to invite increased injuries from that power to whom we had shown this petty resentment at the very moment of proclaiming, in effect, that we either could not or durst not adopt any measure of efficient opposition.
What sub-type of article is it?
Foreign Affairs
Economic Policy
Trade Or Commerce
What keywords are associated?
Neutral Commerce
British Admiralty
Non Importation Act
Us British Relations
Halifax Decisions
What entities or persons were involved?
British Admiralty Courts
Great Britain
Mr. Monroe
President
Congress
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
British Hostility To Neutral Commerce And Critique Of Us Non Importation Act
Stance / Tone
Critical Of British Actions And Us Policy Weakness
Key Figures
British Admiralty Courts
Great Britain
Mr. Monroe
President
Congress
Key Arguments
British Courts Confiscate Neutral Goods From Enemy Colonies Without Regard To Ownership
Non Importation Act Has Provoked Greater British Hostility
Pre Act Hopes For Equitable Adjustments Via Monroe's Representations Have Vanished
Us Declamations, Presidential Messages, And War Speeches Have Led To Petty Spite
Us Policy Invites Contempt And Increased Injuries From Britain