Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
National Republican (Washington City
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
United States Supreme Court proceedings yesterday: bar admissions for two attorneys; arguments concluded, argued, continued, passed, or commenced in multiple cases involving railways, insurance, and individuals.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
The proceedings of the United States supreme court yesterday were as follows:
Admissions to the bar, Sanford B. Ladd, of Kansas City, Mo., and William McKay, of Salt Lake City, Utah.
No. 1240. F. L. Ames et al., &c., plaintiffs in error, vs. the state of Kansas ex rel. W. A. Johnston, attorney general, and No. 1441. The Kansas Pacific railway company, plaintiff in error vs. the state of Kansas ex rel. W. A. Johnston, attorney general. Argument concluded.
No. 110. The Chesapeake and Ohio railway company, plaintiff in error vs. A. E. White, administrator, &c. Return to rule to show cause argued.
No. 242. Joseph J. Mersman, appellant, vs. Casper A. and Lucy W. Wenger. Continued per stipulation.
No. 17. Emilie Moulor, plaintiff in error, vs. The American Life Insurance company. Argued.
No. 240. Tobias New, appellant, vs. Frederick W. Lawrence. Passed.
No. 250. Louis McMurry et al., appellants, vs. D. D. Mallory et al. Arguments commenced.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Event Date
Yesterday
Key Persons
Outcome
admissions to the bar for sanford b. ladd and william mckay. arguments concluded in no. 1240 and no. 1441. return to rule argued in no. 110. continued per stipulation in no. 242. argued in no. 17. passed in no. 240. arguments commenced in no. 250.
Event Details
The proceedings of the United States supreme court yesterday included admissions to the bar, and handling of several cases: arguments concluded in F. L. Ames et al. vs. the state of Kansas and Kansas Pacific railway company vs. the state of Kansas; return to rule argued in Chesapeake and Ohio railway company vs. A. E. White; continued per stipulation in Joseph J. Mersman vs. Casper A. and Lucy W. Wenger; argued in Emilie Moulor vs. The American Life Insurance company; passed in Tobias New vs. Frederick W. Lawrence; arguments commenced in Louis McMurry et al. vs. D. D. Mallory et al.