Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Colorado Statesman
Story December 25, 1920

The Colorado Statesman

Denver, Denver County, Colorado

What is this article about?

Historical opposition to mince or Christmas pie by Puritans, Quakers, and some Church of England members, who thought clergymen should abstain; Bickerdyke remonstrates against this prejudice in a quoted passage.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

OPPOSED TO CHRISTMAS PIE

The Puritans were not alone in their opposition to mince or Christmas pie. The Quakers also fought against it, and at length even many good people of the Church of England began to think that clergymen should abstain from it, against which prejudice Bickerdyke thus remonstrates:

"The Christmas pie is, in its own nature, a kind of consecrated cake or badge of distinction, and yet it is often forbidden the druid of the family. Strange that a sirloin of beef, whether boiled or roasted, when entire is exposed to the utmost depredations and invasions, but if minced into small pieces and tossed up with plums and sugar it changes the property, and forsooth is meat for his master."

What sub-type of article is it?

Curiosity Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Social Manners Moral Virtue

What keywords are associated?

Christmas Pie Puritans Opposition Quakers Church Of England Bickerdyke Religious Prejudice

What entities or persons were involved?

Bickerdyke Puritans Quakers

Story Details

Key Persons

Bickerdyke Puritans Quakers

Story Details

Puritans and Quakers opposed Christmas pie; some Church of England members believed clergymen should abstain. Bickerdyke argues against this, comparing it to beef that becomes forbidden when minced with plums and sugar.

Are you sure?