Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Eureka Daily Sentinel
Story July 28, 1876

Eureka Daily Sentinel

Eureka, Eureka County, Nevada

What is this article about?

During the Belknap impeachment trial in Washington on July 26, defense attorney Carpenter argues that Belknap received money without intent to influence his actions, constituting no crime, and that the Senate lacks jurisdiction, citing legal authorities.

Clipping

OCR Quality

100% Excellent

Full Text

Carpenter's Argument in the Belknap Case.
Washington, July 26.
The impeachment trial was resumed immediately after the Senate was called to order, and Carpenter continued his argument for the defense. He denied that Belknap had received money with intent to have his official action swerved, and without that intent there was no crime. Carpenter then spoke of impeachable crimes and argued that Belknap had not committed any crime, and even if he had taken bribes the courts here in the District were adequate to deal with him. He commented at length on the question of jurisdiction, and cited many legal authorities upon the subject to show that the Senate had no jurisdiction.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Crime Story

What themes does it cover?

Crime Punishment Justice

What keywords are associated?

Belknap Impeachment Carpenter Argument Senate Trial Jurisdiction Bribes

What entities or persons were involved?

Carpenter Belknap

Where did it happen?

Washington

Story Details

Key Persons

Carpenter Belknap

Location

Washington

Event Date

July 26

Story Details

Carpenter defends Belknap in his impeachment trial by arguing no criminal intent in receiving money, no impeachable crime committed, and Senate lacks jurisdiction over the matter.

Are you sure?