Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeKentucky Gazette
Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky
What is this article about?
The U.S. House of Representatives ordered a bill to amend the Judiciary system to a third reading by a vote of 132 to 59 after extensive debate. The bill proposes adding three associate judges, increasing circuits from seven to ten, supported by western needs and eminent jurists.
OCR Quality
Full Text
CONGRESS.
The fate of the bill to amend the Judiciary system of the United States is at length determined in the House of Representatives; it having been yesterday ordered to a third reading in that Body, by a vote of 132 to 59. Perhaps no measure before Congress was ever more thoroughly debated, than this has been; and the decisive majority for its third reading is a strong testimony in favor of the measure. We have heard, from private sources, that the bill, besides being demanded by the wants of the West, and approved by so large a majority of the Representatives of the People, has the approbation of our most eminent jurists.—These last admit there are objections to the measure, but consider them counterbalanced by the positive benefits which it offers, constituting, as they do, an almost imperative necessity for this measure, or for some other liable to greater objections than it is.
The bill, as passed, it will be recollected, proposes to add three to the present number of Associate Judges of the United States, thus increasing the number of circuits of the United States' Courts from seven to ten.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
United States
Event Date
Yesterday
Outcome
ordered to third reading by vote of 132 to 59
Event Details
The bill to amend the Judiciary system was debated thoroughly in Congress and ordered to a third reading in the House of Representatives. It proposes adding three associate judges to increase circuits from seven to ten, demanded by the West, approved by majority of representatives and eminent jurists despite objections.