Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Richmond Enquirer
Editorial March 26, 1822

Richmond Enquirer

Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia

What is this article about?

The editorial contrasts France's regression toward despotism, with losses in legislative independence, press freedom, and trial by jury, against Portugal's progress toward political freedom, including the introduction of jury trials in criminal and civil cases by the Cortes.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

In those revolutions by which "Kingdoms rise and fall, flourish and decay," it is often curious to observe what different aspects Nations and Governments assume at different periods: how some of the most polished nations, by the vices of their rulers, retrograde in all that can render them great and glorious; and how others, apparently sunk in the lowest degree of abasement and degradation, advance with rapid strides to political freedom.—Europe presents a singular instance of this at the present moment.

France, which twenty years ago seemed destined to regenerate the world, is now engaged in a heartless struggle between growing despotism and public feeling, rendered almost torpid. Every year is marked by some retrocession towards the ancient regime, and the abuses by which it was overturned. The prospect of France possessing an Elective Legislative Assembly and Independent Court of Judicature, and a Press with some degree of freedom, which the French Charter guaranteed, is now very distant. The Legislature is little more than a nullity, merely adopting laws presented by the King, or the Minister; the Press, already chained and fettered, seems doomed to a total annihilation, and the Trial by Jury, one of the greatest barriers against tyranny that political wisdom can raise, is to be superseded by an arbitrary Court, appointed and paid by the King.

While France is thus exhibiting such a melancholy picture of political abasement Portugal, which so recently was a thorough despotism, completely at the will of the King and under the rod of the Priesthood, is making a steady progress towards political freedom. We yesterday stated the important fact that the Cortes had decided unanimously to have trial by Jury in all criminal cases; and, by a large majority, they also determined that civil cases should possess the benefit of such an Institution. What a contrast do the Cortes of Lisbon and the Chamber of Deputies present to each other in this respect. This, however, is only one of the liberal acts of the Portuguese Government.

What sub-type of article is it?

Constitutional Legal Reform Foreign Affairs

What keywords are associated?

France Despotism Portugal Freedom Trial By Jury Political Reform Cortes Lisbon French Charter Europe Revolutions

What entities or persons were involved?

France King Of France Minister Cortes Of Lisbon Chamber Of Deputies Portugal King Of Portugal Priesthood

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Contrast Between France's Political Regression And Portugal's Advance To Freedom

Stance / Tone

Critical Of French Despotism, Supportive Of Portuguese Reforms

Key Figures

France King Of France Minister Cortes Of Lisbon Chamber Of Deputies Portugal King Of Portugal Priesthood

Key Arguments

France Is Retrogressing Toward Ancient Regime Abuses French Legislature Is A Nullity Adopting Only Royal Laws French Press Is Being Annihilated Trial By Jury In France Is To Be Replaced By Arbitrary Royal Court Portugal Is Progressing From Despotism To Political Freedom Portuguese Cortes Unanimously Adopt Jury Trials In Criminal Cases Portuguese Cortes By Majority Extend Jury To Civil Cases Contrast Between Cortes Of Lisbon And French Chamber Of Deputies

Are you sure?