Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 8, 1881
The Dallas Daily Herald
Dallas, Dallas County, Texas
What is this article about?
The Fort Worth Advance editorial opposes a Texas railroad bill that would centralize control in three men, calling it objectionable for creating a dictatorial entity worse than railroads, unjust to investors, and likely to halt railroad progress benefiting the state.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
R.R.
Fort Worth Advance.
Of course we mean the railroad bill, which proposes to put the whole railroad business of the state into the hands of three men. We have said before that there are some good features in the bill, but others wholly objectionable. So glaring are the evil features of the bill that we have been of the opinion from the first that the good sense of the house would not entertain a bill containing such inconsistencies. The Advance correspondent at Austin telegraphed us yesterday that our representative, Paddock, is firm in the support of the bill. If our correspondent is correct, then Paddock is not representing the sentiments of this constituency in favoring the bill in anything like the shape in which it was reported by the committee. The Advance has been pronounced on every proper occasion, in urging wise and judicious legislation, both state and national: looking to the proper controlling of railroad and other great corporations and combinations so that they may not grind the people, but this bill provides for the creation of a more dangerous enemy in that dictatorial triumvirate than the railroads themselves are liable to set up in the state. Again there is positive injustice to the people who have invested their money in changing this mighty state from a wilderness into almost a continuous scene of busy and prosperous life. At this the state is receiving more positive good from the railroads now being constructed or in immediate contemplation of construction than from any other source, hence it is the height of folly to adopt a law that would largely if not effectually stop the progress of these roads, besides inflicting both upon the roads and over the state that would prove to be a permanent curse.
Fort Worth Advance.
Of course we mean the railroad bill, which proposes to put the whole railroad business of the state into the hands of three men. We have said before that there are some good features in the bill, but others wholly objectionable. So glaring are the evil features of the bill that we have been of the opinion from the first that the good sense of the house would not entertain a bill containing such inconsistencies. The Advance correspondent at Austin telegraphed us yesterday that our representative, Paddock, is firm in the support of the bill. If our correspondent is correct, then Paddock is not representing the sentiments of this constituency in favoring the bill in anything like the shape in which it was reported by the committee. The Advance has been pronounced on every proper occasion, in urging wise and judicious legislation, both state and national: looking to the proper controlling of railroad and other great corporations and combinations so that they may not grind the people, but this bill provides for the creation of a more dangerous enemy in that dictatorial triumvirate than the railroads themselves are liable to set up in the state. Again there is positive injustice to the people who have invested their money in changing this mighty state from a wilderness into almost a continuous scene of busy and prosperous life. At this the state is receiving more positive good from the railroads now being constructed or in immediate contemplation of construction than from any other source, hence it is the height of folly to adopt a law that would largely if not effectually stop the progress of these roads, besides inflicting both upon the roads and over the state that would prove to be a permanent curse.
What sub-type of article is it?
Infrastructure
Economic Policy
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Railroad Bill
Texas Legislature
Paddock
Triumvirate
Railroad Regulation
Corporate Control
State Development
What entities or persons were involved?
Paddock
Fort Worth Advance
Railroads
Texas House
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition To The Railroad Regulation Bill
Stance / Tone
Strongly Opposed To The Bill
Key Figures
Paddock
Fort Worth Advance
Railroads
Texas House
Key Arguments
The Bill Creates A Dictatorial Triumvirate More Dangerous Than Railroads Themselves.
It Fails To Represent Constituency Sentiments.
It Inflicts Injustice On Investors Who Developed The State.
It Would Stop Railroad Progress, Harming The State's Prosperity.
The Advance Supports Proper Regulation But Not This Flawed Bill.