Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette And Historical Chronicle
Editorial August 30, 1765

The New Hampshire Gazette And Historical Chronicle

Portsmouth, Greenland, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

Boston editorial mocks a pro-Stamp Act writer in the New-Haven Gazette, addresses concerns after the Stamp Officer's resignation, and argues that enforcing the Stamp Act would harm colonial trade, liberty, and Britain's economy by potentially halting commerce and exports.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

B O S T O N, August 26.

A groveling ministerial writer in the New-Haven Gazette, said to be the famous Mr. Ing--ll, tells his readers, that it is the principal business of the Stamp Officer to put it in the power of the people to purchase the stamped paper at the most convenient manner, and to receive and pay-over the moneys. A curious Fellow this!--And that the act of parliament is so contrived, as in most cases, to make it the interest of the people to buy them, as their titles by judgment, &c. obtained otherwise than upon stamped paper, are declar'd void.--We would advise this Retailer to suspend the advertising his Wares till they arrive safe to market; and withal, to take the friendly hint, that if he intends to undervalue other people's paper, in order to recommend his own, it will be deem'd inconsistent with the character of a fair dealer, and he will be treated accordingly.

Since the Resignation of the Stamp-Officer, a Question has been thrown out--How shall we carry on Trade without the Stamp'd Papers?-- Carry on no Trade at all, say some, for who would desire to increase his Property, at the Expence of Liberty.--Others say, that in Case there Shall be no Officer to distribute the Stampt Papers after the first of November, a regular Protest will justify any of his Majesty's Subjects, in any Court of Justice, who shall carry on Business without them? Some very judicious Persons are of Opinion that the Wisdom of the British Parliament will never order any Measures to enforce an Act, utterly irreconcilable to the Friends, not of a Part only, as was the Case of the Cider Act in England, but the WHOLE PEOPLE of America.

To attempt the Enforcement of an Act on the Colonies by Military Strength, would tend to destroy their Usefulness to the Mother Country--- Commercial Intercourse must in a great Measure, if not totally cease--And besides, a Colony of Soldiers is in Effect no Colony at all.

Should the Colonies cease to take off the Manufactures of Great Britain, as they will be under a Necessity of doing very soon, unless she alters her Measures. Thousands of her useful Labourers and their Families must starve--so great a Dependence has the Mother upon her Children.

What sub-type of article is it?

Taxation Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Stamp Act Colonial Opposition Stamp Officer Resignation British Taxation Trade Interruption Parliament Enforcement

What entities or persons were involved?

Stamp Officer Mr. Ing Ll New Haven Gazette British Parliament

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Opposition To The Stamp Act And Its Enforcement

Stance / Tone

Strongly Anti Stamp Act And Pro Colonial Liberty

Key Figures

Stamp Officer Mr. Ing Ll New Haven Gazette British Parliament

Key Arguments

Stamp Act Forces Purchase By Voiding Unstamped Titles Criticize Pro Stamp Writer For Premature Advertising Better No Trade Than Trade At Expense Of Liberty Protest Justifies Business Without Stamps If No Officer Parliament Unlikely To Enforce Act Against All Americans Military Enforcement Would End Commercial Intercourse Colonies Boycotting British Goods Would Starve British Laborers

Are you sure?