Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Detroit Tribune
Story October 8, 1938

The Detroit Tribune

Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan

What is this article about?

Critique in response to Nat Fleischer's Ring magazine article praising Henry Armstrong's boxing attributes by comparing him to legends Joe Walcott, Langford, and Joe Gans, arguing the comparisons overstate Armstrong's one-punch power and ring generalship.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

In a recent issue of Ring magazine, Nat Fleischer in an article about Henry Armstrong, makes the statement that the holder of three championships possesses the stamina of Joe Walcott, the hitting power of Langford, and the cleverness of Joe Gans.

The editor evidently was talking through his hat. Armstrong, with his long list of consecutive knockouts, has never shown the hitting power of Langford—stopping a fighter with one punch. Armstrong beats his man down with a series of blows.

He has shown great stamina, but he has never shown boxing skill which would have warranted his most ardent supporter to have compared him with Gans, one of the greatest ring generals in the craft.

Henry will take more punishment in one bout than Gans was accustomed to take in ten.

What sub-type of article is it?

Biography

What themes does it cover?

Triumph

What keywords are associated?

Henry Armstrong Nat Fleischer Joe Walcott Langford Joe Gans Boxing Skills Knockouts Stamina Ring Magazine

What entities or persons were involved?

Henry Armstrong Nat Fleischer Joe Walcott Langford Joe Gans

Story Details

Key Persons

Henry Armstrong Nat Fleischer Joe Walcott Langford Joe Gans

Story Details

Nat Fleischer in Ring magazine states Henry Armstrong has the stamina of Joe Walcott, hitting power of Langford, and cleverness of Joe Gans. The editor disputes this, noting Armstrong's knockouts come from series of blows, not one-punch power like Langford, lacks Gans' boxing skill, but shows great stamina and takes more punishment than Gans.

Are you sure?