Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 4, 1948
The Northwest Enterprise
Seattle, King County, Washington
What is this article about?
Editorial critiques Portland's police bureau based on August Vollmer's report to Mayor R. Earl Riley, highlighting defects in organization and enforcement, calls for official response and reforms under new Chief James Fleming.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
THE VOLLMER POLICE REPORT TO MAYOR R. EARL RILEY
August Vollmer of Berkeley, California, expert in police organization, has rendered to Mayor R. Earl Riley a report which holds that the Portland police bureau for the last seven years has been defective in almost everything.
It is an analysis which has its cumulative effect censure of police administration in this city. It is censure of law enforcement, of organization, of supervision, of records, of training, of pensions and of pay (too low).
It is, in other words, confirmation by technical authority of complaints that have been made locally less formally but with equal seriousness.
Now, both in the interest of police to Portland's policemen and for the sake of clarifying public understanding, we would like to see an answer to the Vollmer report. An answer, that is, from the men charged with responsibility in law enforcement and police organization.
This answer, the mayor could invite. At the same time he might detail what he conceives to be the relationship of his own position as commissioner of public safety to police administration.
This question of mayor-police relationship long has been a twilight zone which light from the city's chief executive would be welcome.
Nor, is it possible to overlook the fact that the Vollmer report comes as a whole after the appointment of a new chief of police and the beginning of reorganization of the police bureau.
In addition to any defensive answer, therefore, some constructive statements will be due from Chief James Fleming as to steps he has taken, and is taking, to make sure of improvements that expert Vollmer says are due.
Very frankly, August Vollmer states that he did not make the Portland inquiry broad enough to include vice. But he does point statistically to increase in law violation. Make no mistake, the increase of law violation is an unmistakable symptom of insufficiently restrained vice.
The Vollmer report hasn't ended public concern in law enforcement and police administration. It has furnished material that should be useful in forming a more active and expressive public opinion.
August Vollmer of Berkeley, California, expert in police organization, has rendered to Mayor R. Earl Riley a report which holds that the Portland police bureau for the last seven years has been defective in almost everything.
It is an analysis which has its cumulative effect censure of police administration in this city. It is censure of law enforcement, of organization, of supervision, of records, of training, of pensions and of pay (too low).
It is, in other words, confirmation by technical authority of complaints that have been made locally less formally but with equal seriousness.
Now, both in the interest of police to Portland's policemen and for the sake of clarifying public understanding, we would like to see an answer to the Vollmer report. An answer, that is, from the men charged with responsibility in law enforcement and police organization.
This answer, the mayor could invite. At the same time he might detail what he conceives to be the relationship of his own position as commissioner of public safety to police administration.
This question of mayor-police relationship long has been a twilight zone which light from the city's chief executive would be welcome.
Nor, is it possible to overlook the fact that the Vollmer report comes as a whole after the appointment of a new chief of police and the beginning of reorganization of the police bureau.
In addition to any defensive answer, therefore, some constructive statements will be due from Chief James Fleming as to steps he has taken, and is taking, to make sure of improvements that expert Vollmer says are due.
Very frankly, August Vollmer states that he did not make the Portland inquiry broad enough to include vice. But he does point statistically to increase in law violation. Make no mistake, the increase of law violation is an unmistakable symptom of insufficiently restrained vice.
The Vollmer report hasn't ended public concern in law enforcement and police administration. It has furnished material that should be useful in forming a more active and expressive public opinion.
What sub-type of article is it?
Crime Or Punishment
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Vollmner Report
Police Reform
Law Enforcement
Portland Police
Police Administration
What entities or persons were involved?
August Vollmer
Mayor R. Earl Riley
Chief James Fleming
Portland Police Bureau
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Portland Police Administration In Vollmer Report
Stance / Tone
Call For Response And Improvements In Police Organization
Key Figures
August Vollmer
Mayor R. Earl Riley
Chief James Fleming
Portland Police Bureau
Key Arguments
Portland Police Defective In Organization, Supervision, Records, Training, Pensions, And Pay
Confirmation Of Local Complaints By Expert Authority
Need For Answer From Police Administration
Clarification Of Mayor's Role In Police Administration
Steps Taken By New Chief For Improvements
Increase In Law Violations As Symptom Of Unrestrained Vice