Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Southern Enterprise
Editorial September 4, 1867

The Southern Enterprise

Greenville, Greenville County, South Carolina

What is this article about?

Editorial critiques General Sickles' administration in the Carolinas during Reconstruction, highlighting specific unwise and tyrannical orders while defending General Order No. 10 as necessary. Expresses doubt about the benefits of the recent change of commander amid unrest.

Clipping

OCR Quality

92% Excellent

Full Text

THE CHANGE OF COMMANDER. While good may come of these changes, the result is at best doubtful. The excitement, unrest and anxiety attendant upon these changes, is prejudicial in its effect on the peace, the business and prosperity of the country. We are not prepared to defend indiscriminately the administration of Gen. Sickles. We believe that he has issued many wise orders, and again believe he has passed others that were both unwise and tyrannical. In the latter category we would place the notorious bag of order of April 27, 1867; also the order deposing Mr. Zealy, of Columbia, from his office as Magistrate, which we believe was hasty, harsh, and altogether unjust. So also the sentence of the two young men engaged in the late barroom broil in Columbia. So the recent fining of Mr. McNelty for not selling a first class ticket to a colored woman; so the late order animadverting in severe and altogether unjustifiably harsh terms upon gentlemen of unblemished honor in the case of the Bank and Confederate Cavalry fund. Nor must we forget to mention the arbitrary decision in the case of the Charleston Savings Institution still fresh in the memory of all our readers. There may have been other orders of Gen. Sickles, meriting censure perhaps more even than those we have enumerated. But these will suffice for the present.

He has been more often blamed, however for General order No. 10; and yet we believe that he issued it in good faith, with the firm conviction of its necessity at the time, and of its beneficent effect upon the people at large in North and South Carolina. We have always been opposed to every species of stay law, but we can see many extenuating circumstances in the present case, in the fact, that Gen. Sickles advised with the first men in his District on the subject. He consulted the Governors, the Chief Justice, and many other distinguished men in both States, all of whom urged upon him the passage of such an order. Gen. S. himself has set this forth at length in his recent reply to the Charleston Board of Trade,—Charleston News.

What sub-type of article is it?

Military Affairs Legal Reform Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

General Sickles Reconstruction Orders Change Of Commander Stay Law Carolinas Administration Tyrannical Orders General Order No 10

What entities or persons were involved?

Gen. Sickles Mr. Zealy Mr. Mcnelty Charleston Savings Institution Governors Chief Justice Charleston Board Of Trade

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Critique Of General Sickles' Orders And Change Of Commander In The Carolinas

Stance / Tone

Balanced Criticism With Defense Of Key Order, Doubtful Of Command Change

Key Figures

Gen. Sickles Mr. Zealy Mr. Mcnelty Charleston Savings Institution Governors Chief Justice Charleston Board Of Trade

Key Arguments

Change Of Commander Causes Excitement And Anxiety Harmful To Peace And Prosperity Sickles Issued Wise Orders But Also Unwise And Tyrannical Ones Specific Criticized Orders: Bag Order Of April 27, 1867; Deposing Zealy; Sentencing Young Men In Barroom Broil; Fining Mcnelty For Ticket Refusal; Harsh Order On Bank And Confederate Cavalry Fund; Arbitrary Decision On Charleston Savings Institution Defense Of General Order No. 10 As Issued In Good Faith After Consultation With Leaders Opposed To Stay Laws Generally But Extenuating Circumstances Here

Are you sure?