Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 4, 1867
The Southern Enterprise
Greenville, Greenville County, South Carolina
What is this article about?
Editorial critiques General Sickles' administration in the Carolinas during Reconstruction, highlighting specific unwise and tyrannical orders while defending General Order No. 10 as necessary. Expresses doubt about the benefits of the recent change of commander amid unrest.
OCR Quality
92%
Excellent
Full Text
THE CHANGE OF COMMANDER. While good may come of these changes, the result is at best doubtful. The excitement, unrest and anxiety attendant upon these changes, is prejudicial in its effect on the peace, the business and prosperity of the country. We are not prepared to defend indiscriminately the administration of Gen. Sickles. We believe that he has issued many wise orders, and again believe he has passed others that were both unwise and tyrannical. In the latter category we would place the notorious bag of order of April 27, 1867; also the order deposing Mr. Zealy, of Columbia, from his office as Magistrate, which we believe was hasty, harsh, and altogether unjust. So also the sentence of the two young men engaged in the late barroom broil in Columbia. So the recent fining of Mr. McNelty for not selling a first class ticket to a colored woman; so the late order animadverting in severe and altogether unjustifiably harsh terms upon gentlemen of unblemished honor in the case of the Bank and Confederate Cavalry fund. Nor must we forget to mention the arbitrary decision in the case of the Charleston Savings Institution still fresh in the memory of all our readers. There may have been other orders of Gen. Sickles, meriting censure perhaps more even than those we have enumerated. But these will suffice for the present.
He has been more often blamed, however for General order No. 10; and yet we believe that he issued it in good faith, with the firm conviction of its necessity at the time, and of its beneficent effect upon the people at large in North and South Carolina. We have always been opposed to every species of stay law, but we can see many extenuating circumstances in the present case, in the fact, that Gen. Sickles advised with the first men in his District on the subject. He consulted the Governors, the Chief Justice, and many other distinguished men in both States, all of whom urged upon him the passage of such an order. Gen. S. himself has set this forth at length in his recent reply to the Charleston Board of Trade,—Charleston News.
He has been more often blamed, however for General order No. 10; and yet we believe that he issued it in good faith, with the firm conviction of its necessity at the time, and of its beneficent effect upon the people at large in North and South Carolina. We have always been opposed to every species of stay law, but we can see many extenuating circumstances in the present case, in the fact, that Gen. Sickles advised with the first men in his District on the subject. He consulted the Governors, the Chief Justice, and many other distinguished men in both States, all of whom urged upon him the passage of such an order. Gen. S. himself has set this forth at length in his recent reply to the Charleston Board of Trade,—Charleston News.
What sub-type of article is it?
Military Affairs
Legal Reform
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
General Sickles
Reconstruction Orders
Change Of Commander
Stay Law
Carolinas Administration
Tyrannical Orders
General Order No 10
What entities or persons were involved?
Gen. Sickles
Mr. Zealy
Mr. Mcnelty
Charleston Savings Institution
Governors
Chief Justice
Charleston Board Of Trade
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of General Sickles' Orders And Change Of Commander In The Carolinas
Stance / Tone
Balanced Criticism With Defense Of Key Order, Doubtful Of Command Change
Key Figures
Gen. Sickles
Mr. Zealy
Mr. Mcnelty
Charleston Savings Institution
Governors
Chief Justice
Charleston Board Of Trade
Key Arguments
Change Of Commander Causes Excitement And Anxiety Harmful To Peace And Prosperity
Sickles Issued Wise Orders But Also Unwise And Tyrannical Ones
Specific Criticized Orders: Bag Order Of April 27, 1867; Deposing Zealy; Sentencing Young Men In Barroom Broil; Fining Mcnelty For Ticket Refusal; Harsh Order On Bank And Confederate Cavalry Fund; Arbitrary Decision On Charleston Savings Institution
Defense Of General Order No. 10 As Issued In Good Faith After Consultation With Leaders
Opposed To Stay Laws Generally But Extenuating Circumstances Here