Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 13, 1796
Gazette Of The United States
Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania
What is this article about?
An editorial criticizes the opposition party's inconsistent and dogmatic shifts in arguments against a U.S. treaty with Britain, from denying negotiation possibilities to constitutional objections, ultimately portraying their tactics as evasive and inventive.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
The party has Shifted its ground very often, and yet has been, in every change, equally overbearing and dogmatical. First it was impossible we should get any treaty. Britain was not disposed to treat. Our envoy would not be civilly used. Next, Britain was beaten and would refuse nothing. Then it was said, exultingly, by the friends of our independence, France would go to war with us. No treaty; no treaty. with her enemies. The treaty arrives, the virtuous ten think the terms might have been better, more intercourse, islands and all, more amity and mutual advantage; and to bring this about, negotiate again, say they, A printer publishes the treaty with a faithfulness and accuracy that reflected exactly the due praise on the disclosure of it. - The virtuous ten had not, it seems, found out a word of the right objections. Constitution--Constitution--the treaty being against the Constitution is a dead letter : Thus roared the wisdom of a hundred mobs. The House convenes, and behold the objection just whizzing in our ears like the din of a great water fall, turns out an empty sound. The President and Senate are the treaty making department-But then, they are not the treaty making department-as thus-and thus- (here please to insert, from the press of Mr. Bache, 400 pages of metaphysical jargon.) After shedding for 3 weeks rays of darkness on the subject, the President's message is delivered. The words of the Constitution, the words of certain gentlemen, (mind I do not say their honor) opinions long established, usage public and uncontroverted, the analogy with common good and common sense, throw the new creed into some discredit. What is to be done? Deny it—change it, hide it in some new form of words do any thing, rather than let it lie long on the anvil of discussion. Is this Proteus never to be caught? Is the resource of party-invention unexhausted, or does some new Archimedes forge new weapons for them as fast as they break in the hands of the champions? Or when naked and disarmed is their modest appearance a coat of mail—
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
Foreign Affairs
What keywords are associated?
Treaty Opposition
Party Shifts
Constitutional Debate
Britain Treaty
Political Evasion
What entities or persons were involved?
Opposition Party
President
Senate
Mr. Bache
Virtuous Ten
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition Party's Shifting Arguments Against U.S. Britain Treaty
Stance / Tone
Critical And Satirical Of Opposition Tactics
Key Figures
Opposition Party
President
Senate
Mr. Bache
Virtuous Ten
Key Arguments
Party Shifts Ground Repeatedly On Treaty Possibilities
Initial Claims: Britain Unwilling To Treat
Later: Britain Beaten And Compliant
France Would Not Ally With Enemies
Terms Could Be Better; Negotiate Again
Treaty Publication Praised But Objections Invented
Constitutional Invalidity Claimed Then Refuted
President And Senate Affirmed As Treaty Makers
Opposition Evades Discussion With New Arguments