Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 15, 1906
Mexico Missouri Message
Mexico, Audrain County, Missouri
What is this article about?
Editorial from a Missouri newspaper opposes 'home rule' for St. Louis, especially city control of the police, citing lack of support from substantial taxpayers and arguing state oversight by the governor ensures better, apolitical governance. References a disgraced former mayor's self-interested push for it.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
That "Home Rule" Idea.
The following is from the Journal of Agriculture of St. Louis. It gives a peculiar situation, but we believe the story is truthfully told:
As an issue in Missouri politics, the cry of "home rule for St. Louis," which means especially the regulation of the police department by the city government, is meeting with little popular response. It is known that a former mayor, whose administration marked the disgraceful period in St. Louis history, was especially interested in home rule legislation and was injudicious enough to say that if he had the control of the police system he could perpetuate his mayoralty for life. He meant what he said, and knew what he was talking about. He was familiar with the conditions. It was in his term of office that the climax was reached. Knowing these facts we undertake to say that not ten per cent of the substantial business and professional element of St. Louis who pay taxes, and who have the interest of good government at heart, are in favor of the police control being transferred to the city. Let not rural Missouri be deluded by any suggestion that there is any clamor in St. Louis for what is called home rule, as applied to the police system, among the element in favor of good government-among the people who pay taxes, who have no political or official ends to serve except that of good, clean, practical government. The State government is more responsive to popular sentiment than city management-the governor is nearer the whole people and more responsive to them. The police is a state, not a city, power. The governor can best keep the force out of politics. Let the law stand as it is.
The following is from the Journal of Agriculture of St. Louis. It gives a peculiar situation, but we believe the story is truthfully told:
As an issue in Missouri politics, the cry of "home rule for St. Louis," which means especially the regulation of the police department by the city government, is meeting with little popular response. It is known that a former mayor, whose administration marked the disgraceful period in St. Louis history, was especially interested in home rule legislation and was injudicious enough to say that if he had the control of the police system he could perpetuate his mayoralty for life. He meant what he said, and knew what he was talking about. He was familiar with the conditions. It was in his term of office that the climax was reached. Knowing these facts we undertake to say that not ten per cent of the substantial business and professional element of St. Louis who pay taxes, and who have the interest of good government at heart, are in favor of the police control being transferred to the city. Let not rural Missouri be deluded by any suggestion that there is any clamor in St. Louis for what is called home rule, as applied to the police system, among the element in favor of good government-among the people who pay taxes, who have no political or official ends to serve except that of good, clean, practical government. The State government is more responsive to popular sentiment than city management-the governor is nearer the whole people and more responsive to them. The police is a state, not a city, power. The governor can best keep the force out of politics. Let the law stand as it is.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Home Rule
St Louis
Police Control
Missouri Politics
Good Government
State Oversight
What entities or persons were involved?
Former Mayor Of St. Louis
Governor
State Government
City Government
Journal Of Agriculture Of St. Louis
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition To Home Rule For St. Louis Police Control
Stance / Tone
Strongly Against City Control Of Police, Favoring State Oversight
Key Figures
Former Mayor Of St. Louis
Governor
State Government
City Government
Journal Of Agriculture Of St. Louis
Key Arguments
Home Rule For St. Louis Police Lacks Popular Support
Former Mayor Sought It To Perpetuate His Power During A Disgraceful Administration
Less Than 10% Of Substantial Taxpayers Favor Transferring Police Control To The City
Rural Missouri Should Not Be Deluded By Claims Of Clamor For Home Rule Among Good Government Supporters
State Government Is More Responsive To Popular Sentiment Than City Management
Police Is A State Power, And The Governor Can Best Keep It Out Of Politics