Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette
Editorial October 16, 1838

The New Hampshire Gazette

Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

Editorial criticizes Abolitionists for interfering in Ohio election against Governor Vance over slave abduction issue and notes their paradoxical support for Van Buren despite Democratic opposition. Warns against allying with them, drawing parallels to Anti-masons, citing experiences in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The Abolitionists are trying to kick up a bobbery in respect to the Ohio election. Among other horrible crimes of Governor Vance, they have discovered that he delivered up some individual of Brown county, Ohio, indicted in Mason county, Ky. for abducting slaves, upon the requisition of the Governor of Kentucky. We always told the Whigs that the Abolitionists, directly or indirectly, would throw their influence in favor of Van Buren. The party that coaxes them most, will be sure to lose them. Mr Van Buren and his party omit no opportunity to give them a kick, and in return they lick his hand. Just so we have found it in our own experience. While we stretched both our consciences and our judgements to please them, we got nothing but abuse for our courtesy; but since we have taken to "calling things by their right name," they have become very civil.—N. Y. Journal of Commerce

We don't blame the Journal of Commerce for trying to cut acquaintance with the Abolitionists. They are worse than the itch to any party;—real Marplots. Heaven forefend they should ever make the least advances towards a union with the Democratic party. We would do anything to keep them off, and if coaxing will do it as the Journal of Commerce seems to think, we would even call them right down clever fellows; but we suppose nobody would believe what we said;—and we should take care to say in an under tone that we hoped they wouldn't.

We thought about the same of the Anti-masons though they were a leetle mite the cleverest of the two, if there be any preference between the skunk and the hedge-hog. We thought it best for the Democratic party to have nothing to do with them. This was the course in New-Hampshire, and here they scarce found a resting place for the soles of their feet. In Massachusetts and Rhode Island they endeavored to coax them into the Democratic ranks, and perhaps gained some little temporary advantages but what did it amount to? Experience proved that they were not to be depended on.

What sub-type of article is it?

Slavery Abolition Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Abolitionists Ohio Election Governor Vance Van Buren Democrats Anti Masons Political Alliances

What entities or persons were involved?

Abolitionists Governor Vance Van Buren Whigs Democrats Anti Masons Journal Of Commerce

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Abolitionists' Political Unreliability And Influence In Ohio Election

Stance / Tone

Anti Abolitionist Warning Against Alliance With Democrats

Key Figures

Abolitionists Governor Vance Van Buren Whigs Democrats Anti Masons Journal Of Commerce

Key Arguments

Abolitionists Criticize Governor Vance For Returning Slave Abductor Abolitionists Support Van Buren Despite Democratic Hostility Abolitionists Are Unreliable And Damaging Allies Like An Itch Or Marplots Democrats Should Avoid Union With Abolitionists As With Anti Masons Coaxing Abolitionists Leads To Loss; Direct Opposition Gains Civility Experience In New Hampshire Succeeded By Exclusion; Massachusetts And Rhode Island Gained Little From Inclusion

Are you sure?