Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Editorial May 6, 1811

Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger

Norfolk, Virginia

What is this article about?

The editorial defends William Pinkney against criticism in the Baltimore Whig, which accused an Intelligencer piece of whitewashing him. It counters by criticizing James Madison's representation and General Armstrong's servile letter to Napoleon Bonaparte regarding the Duke d'Enghien's murder. Signed Alex. Ado.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

As we expected, the Baltimore Whig is not at all pleased with Mr. Pinkney's apologist in last week's Intelligencer. He politely styles it an attempt to 'wash the Blackamoor white.' He says Mr. P. might have represented Mr. Madison in London, but he never represented the people of this country. What people does he mean? Why, those who were eternally crying 'havock,' alias, a new toast drinkers on the fourth of July, many of whom were probably ashamed of these very toasts, when they saw them in print. The Whig says, he will not insult gen. Armstrong by comparing him with Mr. Pinkney. But we have not forgotten the Servile letter which Armstrong wrote to Bonaparte, congratulating him on his fortunate escape from a conspiracy, which was notoriously a miserable pretext for murdering the Duke of Enghien, basely seized on a neutral territory. We recollect other pithy stories, but they are well known. It must be no small gratification to Mr. Pinkney to find, that his conduct has received the disapprobation of men 'whose praise is censure, and whose censure praise.' Such are the defenders of Armstrong and Wilkinson.

Alex. Ado.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Foreign Affairs

What keywords are associated?

Pinkney Defense Baltimore Whig Armstrong Letter Bonaparte Conspiracy Duke Enghien Partisan Criticism July Toasts

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Pinkney Baltimore Whig Mr. Madison Gen. Armstrong Bonaparte Duke Of Enghien Wilkinson

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of William Pinkney Against Baltimore Whig Criticism

Stance / Tone

Supportive Of Pinkney, Critical Of Armstrong And His Defenders

Key Figures

Mr. Pinkney Baltimore Whig Mr. Madison Gen. Armstrong Bonaparte Duke Of Enghien Wilkinson

Key Arguments

Baltimore Whig's Criticism Is An Attempt To 'Wash The Blackamoor White' Pinkney Represented Madison But Not The People Who Toasted Inappropriately On July 4 Armstrong's Servile Letter To Bonaparte Congratulated Him On Escaping A Conspiracy Pretext For Murdering Duke Of Enghien Pinkney's Critics Are Men Whose Praise Is Censure And Censure Is Praise Defenders Of Armstrong And Wilkinson Disapprove Of Pinkney's Conduct

Are you sure?