Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 6, 1811
Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Norfolk, Virginia
What is this article about?
The editorial defends William Pinkney against criticism in the Baltimore Whig, which accused an Intelligencer piece of whitewashing him. It counters by criticizing James Madison's representation and General Armstrong's servile letter to Napoleon Bonaparte regarding the Duke d'Enghien's murder. Signed Alex. Ado.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
As we expected, the Baltimore Whig is not at all pleased with Mr. Pinkney's apologist in last week's Intelligencer. He politely styles it an attempt to 'wash the Blackamoor white.' He says Mr. P. might have represented Mr. Madison in London, but he never represented the people of this country. What people does he mean? Why, those who were eternally crying 'havock,' alias, a new toast drinkers on the fourth of July, many of whom were probably ashamed of these very toasts, when they saw them in print. The Whig says, he will not insult gen. Armstrong by comparing him with Mr. Pinkney. But we have not forgotten the Servile letter which Armstrong wrote to Bonaparte, congratulating him on his fortunate escape from a conspiracy, which was notoriously a miserable pretext for murdering the Duke of Enghien, basely seized on a neutral territory. We recollect other pithy stories, but they are well known. It must be no small gratification to Mr. Pinkney to find, that his conduct has received the disapprobation of men 'whose praise is censure, and whose censure praise.' Such are the defenders of Armstrong and Wilkinson.
Alex. Ado.
Alex. Ado.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Foreign Affairs
What keywords are associated?
Pinkney Defense
Baltimore Whig
Armstrong Letter
Bonaparte Conspiracy
Duke Enghien
Partisan Criticism
July Toasts
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Pinkney
Baltimore Whig
Mr. Madison
Gen. Armstrong
Bonaparte
Duke Of Enghien
Wilkinson
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of William Pinkney Against Baltimore Whig Criticism
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Pinkney, Critical Of Armstrong And His Defenders
Key Figures
Mr. Pinkney
Baltimore Whig
Mr. Madison
Gen. Armstrong
Bonaparte
Duke Of Enghien
Wilkinson
Key Arguments
Baltimore Whig's Criticism Is An Attempt To 'Wash The Blackamoor White'
Pinkney Represented Madison But Not The People Who Toasted Inappropriately On July 4
Armstrong's Servile Letter To Bonaparte Congratulated Him On Escaping A Conspiracy Pretext For Murdering Duke Of Enghien
Pinkney's Critics Are Men Whose Praise Is Censure And Censure Is Praise
Defenders Of Armstrong And Wilkinson Disapprove Of Pinkney's Conduct