Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Vermont Watchman And State Journal
Editorial October 12, 1866

Vermont Watchman And State Journal

Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont

What is this article about?

A Boston Journal editorial satirizes racial hypocrisy in Virginia, contrasting historical ear-cropping punishments for Black perjurers with leniency toward white Southerners who broke oaths to join the Confederacy, critiquing slavery's failure to instill moral respect for oaths.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Black and White Perjury.

A Richmond paper has the following characteristic remarks:

"In old times, when a negro committed perjury, the sentence of the law required that his ears should be nailed to the public pillory (which was constructed on every court-green) and then and there cut off! A caution to culprits, when he was sworn and called upon to testify, that this punishment awaited him if he did not tell the truth, it is said to have always brought it out of him. Unless some such means as this shall be resorted to there will never be any chance of preventing perjury in negro witnesses, for they have no respect for the sanctity of an oath and no idea of the enormity of forswearing. For more than two hundred years they were engaged in Virginia in humanizing and Christianizing the African, as they claimed, through the patriarchal institution of slavery. By their own confession above they could not be held to have met with very great success, when the cutting off of ears is reckoned to have been among the most salutary of mutual restraints. Perhaps the difficulty was in the teachers. Our officers and soldiers stationed in Virginia during the war had occasion often to make the same comments on white residents' habitual disregard of his oath of allegiance which are applied in the above extract to "cuffee's" addiction to perjury. Again, the organs of the chivalry are just now making a great outcry against that clause of the Constitutional amendment which would prevent those men from holding offices of trust and honor who broke their oaths to the Government of the United States in order to take new oaths to the fictitious "Southern Confederacy." They think that these perjured men have done nothing worthy of blame, while "cuffee," for disregarding his oath in a case affecting himself to the extent of twenty-five cents, ought to have his ears cut off! Human nature is a curiosity, especially down in Virginia.—Boston Journal.

What sub-type of article is it?

Crime Or Punishment Moral Or Religious Social Reform

What keywords are associated?

Perjury Negro Witnesses Oath Sanctity Racial Hypocrisy Virginia Slavery Confederate Oaths

What entities or persons were involved?

Richmond Paper Negro Witnesses White Residents Of Virginia Southern Confederacy

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Racial Hypocrisy In Perjury And Oath Breaking

Stance / Tone

Satirical Critique Of Southern Racism

Key Figures

Richmond Paper Negro Witnesses White Residents Of Virginia Southern Confederacy

Key Arguments

  • historical punishment of ear-cropping deterred black perjury but failed overall
  • slavery did not successfully instill respect for oaths in africans
  • white virginians disregarded oath of allegiance during the war
  • hypocrisy in opposing constitutional amendment barring perjured confederates from office while demanding harsh punishment for black perjurers

Are you sure?