Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 21, 1825
Phenix Gazette
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
The Alexandria Gazette addresses a sarcastic erratum in the Norfolk Herald about mistakenly crediting them for northern papers received via the Potomac steamboat. It clarifies their exchange practices with the Herald and Beacon, notes papers sent but not received by the Beacon, and calls for explanation of the mystery.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Norfolk Herald of Tuesday last announced that Mr. Lyford had received late northern papers; by the steamboat Potomac, from his correspondent of the "Alexandria Gazette;" but in Monday's Herald we find the following sarcastic erratum:
"We inadvertently gave credit in our last to the "Alexandria Gazette" for papers forwarded by the Potomac to the Commercial Reading Room. A more palpable mistake could not have been made. It is enough to say, that the papers were received from another source."
We never have corresponded with Mr. Lyford nor do we send him our paper—with the Herald we exchange regularly, both by mail and by steam-boat, but have no further intercourse. How the mistake arose we cannot say, much less can we account for the manner in which it is corrected. The Alexandria Gazette for many years corresponded with the Norfolk Beacon, and the "Phenix Gazette" has continued the correspondence with great advantage to its readers. We are in the habit of sending Messrs. Shields & Ashburn of the Beacon, the latest northern papers by every boat—we did so by the Potomac last week, but we learn by letter from those gentlemen, that none were received. "It is enough to say;" that they were sent—that they contained interesting information—the very information indeed, that we recognize in the Herald of Friday. There is a mystery in the matter that we should like to see explained.
"We inadvertently gave credit in our last to the "Alexandria Gazette" for papers forwarded by the Potomac to the Commercial Reading Room. A more palpable mistake could not have been made. It is enough to say, that the papers were received from another source."
We never have corresponded with Mr. Lyford nor do we send him our paper—with the Herald we exchange regularly, both by mail and by steam-boat, but have no further intercourse. How the mistake arose we cannot say, much less can we account for the manner in which it is corrected. The Alexandria Gazette for many years corresponded with the Norfolk Beacon, and the "Phenix Gazette" has continued the correspondence with great advantage to its readers. We are in the habit of sending Messrs. Shields & Ashburn of the Beacon, the latest northern papers by every boat—we did so by the Potomac last week, but we learn by letter from those gentlemen, that none were received. "It is enough to say;" that they were sent—that they contained interesting information—the very information indeed, that we recognize in the Herald of Friday. There is a mystery in the matter that we should like to see explained.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Satire
What keywords are associated?
Newspaper Exchange
Source Attribution
Sarcastic Erratum
Northern Papers
Potomac Steamboat
Norfolk Herald
Alexandria Gazette
What entities or persons were involved?
Norfolk Herald
Mr. Lyford
Alexandria Gazette
Norfolk Beacon
Phenix Gazette
Messrs. Shields & Ashburn
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Dispute Over Attribution Of Northern Papers Source
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Inquisitive
Key Figures
Norfolk Herald
Mr. Lyford
Alexandria Gazette
Norfolk Beacon
Phenix Gazette
Messrs. Shields & Ashburn
Key Arguments
Herald's Sarcastic Erratum Incorrectly Credits Gazette For Papers
Gazette Exchanges With Herald But Not Directly With Lyford
Gazette Sends Papers To Beacon Regularly, Including Last Week Via Potomac
Beacon Did Not Receive The Sent Papers
Information In Herald Matches What Gazette Sent
Mystery In The Matter Requires Explanation