Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
October 29, 1882
The Waco Daily Examiner
Waco, Mclennan County, Texas
What is this article about?
In Brooklyn, a blind man defies a jury summons, is dragged to court by officers, fined $25 by Judge Kiehl, and compelled to serve on the jury, raising questions about the wisdom of the decision.
OCR Quality
92%
Excellent
Full Text
MAKING A FARCE OF IT.
There would seem to be no end of the variety of ways in which the unwillingness of certain men to serve on juries can be demonstrated but it has been reserved for a Brooklyn Judge to furnish an instance of forcing a blind man to serve as a juryman. An item in New York papers of a case was called in Judge Kiehl's court last Monday, when it appeared that he of the myopia was absent. A constable was sent to bring in the delinquent juror, but the latter told the officer that he, the officer, wasn't big enough to take him into court, and defied the writ and the officer: then the latter procured the help of another officer, and the two, pulling together, did succeed in dragging the reluctant and indignant man into the presence of the court. The Judge imposed on the delinquent man a fine of twenty five dollars, which was paid and the juror was then compelled to take his seat along with the eleven other jurors and try the case. The imposition of the fine on the juror was right and richly deserved. but it may be questioned if the action of the court, in forcing or allowing such a man to sit and act as a juror, was right and wise. Any man who can defy the law could be fit to act as a Juror in any case. Such occurrences are fortunately very rare, but when they do happen they are talked of and not forgotten and their inevitable tendency is to bring the jury system into contempt.
There would seem to be no end of the variety of ways in which the unwillingness of certain men to serve on juries can be demonstrated but it has been reserved for a Brooklyn Judge to furnish an instance of forcing a blind man to serve as a juryman. An item in New York papers of a case was called in Judge Kiehl's court last Monday, when it appeared that he of the myopia was absent. A constable was sent to bring in the delinquent juror, but the latter told the officer that he, the officer, wasn't big enough to take him into court, and defied the writ and the officer: then the latter procured the help of another officer, and the two, pulling together, did succeed in dragging the reluctant and indignant man into the presence of the court. The Judge imposed on the delinquent man a fine of twenty five dollars, which was paid and the juror was then compelled to take his seat along with the eleven other jurors and try the case. The imposition of the fine on the juror was right and richly deserved. but it may be questioned if the action of the court, in forcing or allowing such a man to sit and act as a juror, was right and wise. Any man who can defy the law could be fit to act as a Juror in any case. Such occurrences are fortunately very rare, but when they do happen they are talked of and not forgotten and their inevitable tendency is to bring the jury system into contempt.
What sub-type of article is it?
Curiosity
What themes does it cover?
Justice
Crime Punishment
What keywords are associated?
Blind Juror
Jury Defiance
Court Fine
Jury System
What entities or persons were involved?
Judge Kiehl
Delinquent Juror
Where did it happen?
Brooklyn, New York
Story Details
Key Persons
Judge Kiehl
Delinquent Juror
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Event Date
Last Monday
Story Details
A blind man defies a summons to serve as a juror in Judge Kiehl's court; officers drag him in; he is fined $25 and forced to sit on the jury despite his disability.