Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freePhenix Gazette
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
Commentary on editorial reactions to James Buchanan's statement, which fails to support Andrew Jackson's allegations of a corrupt bargain by Henry Clay for Secretary of State position. New York Evening Post editor retracts initial admission, while New York Statesman deems it conclusive against the charge.
OCR Quality
Full Text
'I hasten to correct the first and very erroneous impressions that were made on our minds by the perusal of Mr. Buchanan's letter. We were led to a further and more critical examination of its contents, by the sensible, pertinent and acute remarks of a correspondent, as well as by the calumnious, abusive and unbecoming observations of the American of last evening.'
The truth is, that neither the correspondent nor the Editor of the American, had any influence over Mr. Coleman's mind. When he first published the statement he was under the impression that none of his coadjutors would again attempt to support slander: but the next mail carried him the modus operandi of Duff Green, and satisfied him that the Hero's followers were determined to maintain their position at all hazards. To retract was death; to go on could be no worse.
Notwithstanding this sudden tergiversation of one Combination Editor, we will venture to give the first impressions of another. The New York Statesman thus speaks of the matter:
'In another column, the reader will find the candid, and, as it appears to us, the conclusive statement of Mr. Buchanan, relative to the only conversation he had with Gen. Jackson on the subject in controversy. We say conclusive, because we think it successfully confronts and ought to put to rest the charge either direct or implied, that Mr. Clay by his own motion, or by his friends, acting under his authority, ever made a distinct proposition to make General Jackson President, on condition that Mr. Clay should be appointed Secretary of State. We are the more ready to say that Mr. Buchanan's letter is conclusive in regard to any direct application to Gen. Jackson whether he would make Mr. Clay Secretary, if Mr. Clay would make the General President, because, we honestly entertained doubts upon that subject, which, we are happy to say, Mr. Buchanan's letter has dissipated. It appears to us, that there is nothing to sustain such a charge, and therefore, that it should be at once, and forever, abandoned.'
We have yet to learn that these sentiments have been recalled; and we are bound to say, that the high character of the Editors of the Statesman forbids us to anticipate such an occurrence.
He who thinks more of the manner than of the matter of a speaker, will never profit by his words.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
New York
Event Date
Yesterday's Gazette
Key Persons
Outcome
mr. coleman's initial opinion that buchanan's statement does not support jackson's allegations is retracted; new york statesman views it as conclusive against the charge of corrupt bargain.
Event Details
Editorial analysis of reactions to Mr. Buchanan's statement on his conversation with Gen. Jackson regarding allegations of bargain and corruption involving Mr. Clay. Mr. Coleman of New York Evening Post initially finds it insufficient but retracts; New York Statesman calls it conclusive exoneration.