Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
February 28, 1842
The Daily Madisonian
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
Judge Upshur triumphs in vindicating his character against Mr. Botts' accusation of being an 'unqualified disunionist.' Botts' charges are disproved, with Harrison's testimony deemed unreliable and inadmissible.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
From the Norfolk Chronicle and Old Dominion.
THE FOG CLEARED UP—THE QUESTION OF VERACITY SETTLED
Never perhaps in the whole history of litigated questions, involving the accuracy of individual opinion and the character of man for veracity, was there ever so perfect and triumphant a vindication as in the case of Judge Upshur against the accusation of Mr. Botts that he was "an unqualified disunionist"
The Hudibrastic lines
"Whether aimed at duck or plover.
It shot and kicked the shooter over,"
never found a worthier object than the Hon. John Minor Botts in this particular case—his charge is disproved beyond all controversy and the possibility even of reclamation forever hereafter—a perfect extinguisher has been placed by the manly and dignified reply of Judge Upshur upon the little rush light—his enemies raised to brand him as an enemy to the Union. It seems that Mr. Harrison, though a bitter enemy of the Judge, had the indelicacy not only to give testimony against him, but himself to become an accuser, and to relate conversations entirely confidential; no testimony yet adduced by Mr. Botts would be received in a Court of Justice. The cross examination by Judge Upshur has demonstrated this beyond all doubt.
THE FOG CLEARED UP—THE QUESTION OF VERACITY SETTLED
Never perhaps in the whole history of litigated questions, involving the accuracy of individual opinion and the character of man for veracity, was there ever so perfect and triumphant a vindication as in the case of Judge Upshur against the accusation of Mr. Botts that he was "an unqualified disunionist"
The Hudibrastic lines
"Whether aimed at duck or plover.
It shot and kicked the shooter over,"
never found a worthier object than the Hon. John Minor Botts in this particular case—his charge is disproved beyond all controversy and the possibility even of reclamation forever hereafter—a perfect extinguisher has been placed by the manly and dignified reply of Judge Upshur upon the little rush light—his enemies raised to brand him as an enemy to the Union. It seems that Mr. Harrison, though a bitter enemy of the Judge, had the indelicacy not only to give testimony against him, but himself to become an accuser, and to relate conversations entirely confidential; no testimony yet adduced by Mr. Botts would be received in a Court of Justice. The cross examination by Judge Upshur has demonstrated this beyond all doubt.
What sub-type of article is it?
Historical Event
Biography
Personal Triumph
What themes does it cover?
Justice
Triumph
What keywords are associated?
Vindication
Political Accusation
Disunionist
Veracity
Cross Examination
Judge Upshur
John Minor Botts
What entities or persons were involved?
Judge Upshur
Mr. Botts
Mr. Harrison
Hon. John Minor Botts
Story Details
Key Persons
Judge Upshur
Mr. Botts
Mr. Harrison
Hon. John Minor Botts
Story Details
Judge Upshur's dignified reply and cross-examination disprove Mr. Botts' accusation of disunionism, rendering Harrison's confidential testimony inadmissible and vindicating Upshur's veracity.