Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Litchfield Enquirer
Editorial July 14, 1831

Litchfield Enquirer

Litchfield, Litchfield County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

The editorial observes the Charleston Mercury's shift from staunch Jackson support to criticism amid the cabinet quarrel, quoting its reluctant coverage of the Eaton-Ingham correspondence as evidence of administration dysfunction and national embarrassment.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The Charleston Mercury has heretofore been a thorough-going Jackson print—and the editor (who if we recollect aright was a member of the last legislature of South Carolina, and elected Speaker of the House,)—has used his utmost efforts to extend and build up the Jackson party. Its tone since the famous quarrel in the cabinet is considerably changed—or instance, read the annexed paragraph from a late number of that paper. The editor however is only following the example of thousands in all sections of the country in deserting the falling fortunes of an administration which has proved itself incapable of conducting the government with any credit.

"In our paper of this morning will be found a most extraordinary correspondence between Messrs. Eaton and Ingham who were still acting at the time in the distinguished stations of Secretaries of the War and Treasury Departments of the United States. No parallel can be found to it in any civilized country. We copy it with feelings of the deepest reluctance, and only under a conviction that it is our duty to lay it before our readers, as a genuine exhibition of the true state of things at Washington, and as furnishing a very probable explanation of the real causes of the late explosion of the Cabinet. We have heretofore seen sn abundance of matter, in relation to the subject of this correspondence, in other papers, which we regretted to perceive, having always regarded it as a topic which should not have been made the subject of public agitation or discussion. But now that it has taken, as it were, an official shape, and has become identified with the character of our Government, we place it upon record as a part—a revolting part—of the history of our country. We make no comment upon the dispute itself. We only feel, as every American must feel, that scenes like these, whilst they humble every lover of our country, cannot fail to cause it to be despised abroad; nor have we words to express our regret that such occurrences should have taken place under an administration which we ardently desired and zealously labored to elevate to power, and under whose auspices we had fondly and confidently trusted, that our country would have assumed an honorable and enviable name amongst the nations of the earth."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Jackson Administration Cabinet Quarrel Eaton Ingham Correspondence Partisan Shift Charleston Mercury

What entities or persons were involved?

Charleston Mercury Jackson Party Eaton Ingham Jackson Administration

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Shift In Charleston Mercury's Support For Jackson Administration Due To Cabinet Quarrel

Stance / Tone

Critical Of Jackson Administration's Dysfunction

Key Figures

Charleston Mercury Jackson Party Eaton Ingham Jackson Administration

Key Arguments

Charleston Mercury Has Changed From Pro Jackson To Critical Eaton Ingham Correspondence Reveals Cabinet Discord Such Scenes Embarrass The Nation And Harm Its International Reputation Regret Over Supporting An Incapable Administration

Are you sure?