Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Staunton Spectator
Editorial March 4, 1885

Staunton Spectator

Staunton, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial argues that civil service reform requires appointing new, law-abiding officials rather than retaining those appointed through favoritism or partisanship over the past 24 years, as the old guard cannot adapt to the new system.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The Boston Herald says: "A large number of persons are destined to learn that civil service reform does not consist in keeping in office everybody appointed through favoritism or for partisan service." That means, of course, that civil service reform should be inaugurated by putting men in office who have never violated the law, and who will be expected to respect its provisions during their official career. It could scarcely be expected that the officials who, for the last four-and-twenty years have been educated under a wholly different system, could adapt themselves to the new order of things. The reform must be commenced by putting in reformers, otherwise, it will be a dismal failure.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Legal Reform

What keywords are associated?

Civil Service Reform Partisan Service Government Appointments Official Adaptation Reformers

What entities or persons were involved?

Boston Herald

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Implementing Civil Service Reform By Appointing New Reformers

Stance / Tone

Advocacy For Starting Civil Service Reform With Non Partisan Appointees

Key Figures

Boston Herald

Key Arguments

Civil Service Reform Does Not Mean Retaining Favoritism Or Partisan Appointees Reform Requires Appointing Officials Who Have Never Violated The Law Long Serving Officials From The Past 24 Years Cannot Adapt To The New System Reform Must Begin With Installing Reformers To Avoid Failure

Are you sure?