Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 4, 1885
Staunton Spectator
Staunton, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial argues that civil service reform requires appointing new, law-abiding officials rather than retaining those appointed through favoritism or partisanship over the past 24 years, as the old guard cannot adapt to the new system.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Boston Herald says: "A large number of persons are destined to learn that civil service reform does not consist in keeping in office everybody appointed through favoritism or for partisan service." That means, of course, that civil service reform should be inaugurated by putting men in office who have never violated the law, and who will be expected to respect its provisions during their official career. It could scarcely be expected that the officials who, for the last four-and-twenty years have been educated under a wholly different system, could adapt themselves to the new order of things. The reform must be commenced by putting in reformers, otherwise, it will be a dismal failure.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Civil Service Reform
Partisan Service
Government Appointments
Official Adaptation
Reformers
What entities or persons were involved?
Boston Herald
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Implementing Civil Service Reform By Appointing New Reformers
Stance / Tone
Advocacy For Starting Civil Service Reform With Non Partisan Appointees
Key Figures
Boston Herald
Key Arguments
Civil Service Reform Does Not Mean Retaining Favoritism Or Partisan Appointees
Reform Requires Appointing Officials Who Have Never Violated The Law
Long Serving Officials From The Past 24 Years Cannot Adapt To The New System
Reform Must Begin With Installing Reformers To Avoid Failure