Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Rawlins Republican
Domestic News April 8, 1903

Rawlins Republican

Rawlins, Carbon County, Wyoming

What is this article about?

Carbon County wool growers resist Sweetwater County assessor's attempt to tax sheep that range partly in Sweetwater, arguing state statute requires assessment at home range. Courts likely to favor Carbon County residents over non-resident taxation rules.

Clipping

OCR Quality

100% Excellent

Full Text

The Carbon county wool growers will resist to the last the attempt of the Sweetwater county assessor to collect taxes on Carbon county sheep ranged for part of the year in Sweetwater county.

The section of the statute which provides that stock shall be assessed in the county where the home range is situated would seem to give the Carbon county sheepmen the best of the argument. If the sheep were owned by non-residents of the state there would be no question about Sweetwater county being entitled to collect taxes for the portion of the year which the stock is ranged in that county, but being the property of residents and taxes being paid thereon in this state, it is extremely doubtful if the courts would say that Sweetwater county is entitled to any portion of the taxes.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court Economic Agriculture

What keywords are associated?

Tax Dispute Sheep Taxes Carbon County Sweetwater County Wool Growers Livestock Assessment

Where did it happen?

Carbon And Sweetwater Counties

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Carbon And Sweetwater Counties

Outcome

wool growers resisting tax collection; statute favors carbon county; doubtful sweetwater entitled to taxes from state residents.

Event Details

Carbon county wool growers resist Sweetwater county assessor's attempt to collect taxes on Carbon county sheep ranged partly in Sweetwater county. Statute provides stock assessed where home range situated, giving Carbon sheepmen strong argument. For non-residents, Sweetwater could tax portion, but as residents paying state taxes, courts unlikely to allow Sweetwater portion.

Are you sure?