Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 7, 1834
Alexandria Gazette
Alexandria, Alexandria County, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
The editorial critiques inconsistent definitions of 'Republican' among political factions, adopts Madison's views on nullification and secession, and endorses Delegate Janney's definition of true Republicans as patriots devoted to saving institutions from executive overreach under the current administration.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
REPUBLICAN DOCTRINES.
The adverse factions of the present day have each and all, we believe, denominated themselves, par excellence, the "Republican party."
Let a definition be asked of this Republicanism, however, and the various answers to the question will show that no one of them agrees with the other,-and, hence, that the mere name is adopted without any reference to principles.
One party proves that the essence of Republicanism is devotion to Jackson: the nullifier tells you that he only is a Republican who supports his doctrine, &c. &c.
When the South Carolina disturbance divided the nation, we took occasion, at an early day, to state our views on that question, as well as on secession, &c., by quoting and adopting the opinions of Mr. Madison, as expressed in his letter to Mr. Everett. Those opinions, thus quoted and adopted, we desire to be considered as our own creed and doctrine with regard to those matters.
We desire now, also, to state our opinions as to what are now Republican doctrines, and who are now Republicans;—and this we do in the language of Mr. Janney, one of the delegates from Loudoun, in his recent speech on the nomination of Mr. Leigh to the Senate.
Mr. Janney said:
" We have been amused with a discussion as to which of the two candidates was the better Republican; but this is a controversy which never can be settled, until we can agree upon some common standard by which to try the legitimacy of their titles. The member from E. City (Mr. Jones) claims to be a Republican, and maintains that the States retain undiminished their entire original sovereignty, and that his is the only true Republican doctrine. The gentleman from Isle of Wight (Mr. Holleman) considers the President of the United States a supporter of his measures the best test of the true genuine Republican, and seems to think a supporter of the present Administration might be safely trusted; while I, on my part, also claim to be a Republican, and yet differ from both. The gentleman from Isle of Wight, who is an ardent supporter of the present Administration, might, one would suppose, be perfectly satisfied with either of the candidates, on the score of their political orthodoxy, when we see that Louis McLane and Roger B. Taney have been admitted into full membership and placed at the head of the communion table. The theories of the present day are too fluctuating and fleeting to be relied upon. I want a practical test, and in this case I can find it. Ours was intended to be in practice, what it is in theory, a government of laws, emanating from the people; but now we behold our destinies bound up in the will of one man, and the enterprise and the energy of a free people, palsied by one of their public servants. That man is, in my judgment, the best Republican who, whatever may have been his former party designation, is now most willing to devote himself to the service of his country, and to rescue her valued institutions from the perils which surround them."
This is our doctrine. We want no better evidence of Republicanism.
The adverse factions of the present day have each and all, we believe, denominated themselves, par excellence, the "Republican party."
Let a definition be asked of this Republicanism, however, and the various answers to the question will show that no one of them agrees with the other,-and, hence, that the mere name is adopted without any reference to principles.
One party proves that the essence of Republicanism is devotion to Jackson: the nullifier tells you that he only is a Republican who supports his doctrine, &c. &c.
When the South Carolina disturbance divided the nation, we took occasion, at an early day, to state our views on that question, as well as on secession, &c., by quoting and adopting the opinions of Mr. Madison, as expressed in his letter to Mr. Everett. Those opinions, thus quoted and adopted, we desire to be considered as our own creed and doctrine with regard to those matters.
We desire now, also, to state our opinions as to what are now Republican doctrines, and who are now Republicans;—and this we do in the language of Mr. Janney, one of the delegates from Loudoun, in his recent speech on the nomination of Mr. Leigh to the Senate.
Mr. Janney said:
" We have been amused with a discussion as to which of the two candidates was the better Republican; but this is a controversy which never can be settled, until we can agree upon some common standard by which to try the legitimacy of their titles. The member from E. City (Mr. Jones) claims to be a Republican, and maintains that the States retain undiminished their entire original sovereignty, and that his is the only true Republican doctrine. The gentleman from Isle of Wight (Mr. Holleman) considers the President of the United States a supporter of his measures the best test of the true genuine Republican, and seems to think a supporter of the present Administration might be safely trusted; while I, on my part, also claim to be a Republican, and yet differ from both. The gentleman from Isle of Wight, who is an ardent supporter of the present Administration, might, one would suppose, be perfectly satisfied with either of the candidates, on the score of their political orthodoxy, when we see that Louis McLane and Roger B. Taney have been admitted into full membership and placed at the head of the communion table. The theories of the present day are too fluctuating and fleeting to be relied upon. I want a practical test, and in this case I can find it. Ours was intended to be in practice, what it is in theory, a government of laws, emanating from the people; but now we behold our destinies bound up in the will of one man, and the enterprise and the energy of a free people, palsied by one of their public servants. That man is, in my judgment, the best Republican who, whatever may have been his former party designation, is now most willing to devote himself to the service of his country, and to rescue her valued institutions from the perils which surround them."
This is our doctrine. We want no better evidence of Republicanism.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Republican Doctrines
Party Factions
Nullification
Secession
Madison Opinions
Janney Speech
Executive Overreach
What entities or persons were involved?
Jackson
Madison
Mr. Janney
Mr. Leigh
Mr. Jones
Mr. Holleman
Louis Mclane
Roger B. Taney
South Carolina
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Definition Of True Republicanism
Stance / Tone
Endorsement Of Practical Patriotism Over Party Labels
Key Figures
Jackson
Madison
Mr. Janney
Mr. Leigh
Mr. Jones
Mr. Holleman
Louis Mclane
Roger B. Taney
South Carolina
Key Arguments
Varying Definitions Of Republicanism Show The Label Lacks Principled Meaning.
Adopts Madison's Opinions On Nullification And Secession As Own Creed.
Endorses Janney's View That True Republicans Prioritize National Service Over Party Allegiance.
Criticizes Administration Supporters And Executive Overreach As Un Republican.
Seeks Practical Test: Devotion To Rescuing Institutions From Perils.