Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
November 3, 1892
The Salt Lake Herald
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
What is this article about?
Editorial criticizes Attorney-General Miller's circular instructing U.S. marshals as election supervisors, viewing it as Republican voter intimidation in northern and border states. Highlights conflicts with state laws and parallels to the Force bill.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Red Force in the North.
The extraordinary circular of Attorney-General Miller, in regard to the duties of United States marshals as supervisors of election, is intended as an intimidation of voters in New York, Connecticut, Delaware and West Virginia, where the most desperate measures are being resorted to in behalf of the Republicans. If Miller's interpretation of the existing laws is correct, there is no need for any Force bill, such as has been talked of, for the subjugation of southern electors, and any disclaimer of intending to pass one is useless. Indeed, Mr. Lodge, the author of that bill deliberately assured audience after audience in 1890, that the measure simply undertook to apply all over the country a law already on the statute books affecting large cities. Attorney-General Miller has thus adopted for the north and the "border" states, the construction that the supporters of the Election bill put upon the Supervisor's law as executed in the cities.
As we read General Miller's circular it virtually makes the supervisors a partisan board of review and returning board. It is proposed to carry the supervision considerably beyond mere observation, and the attorney-general is careful to remind the country that "the national government has the right to use physical force in any part of the United States to compel obedience to laws," etc. So, too, in reference to the deputies being inside the guards at the polling places, he declares the Federal law gives the deputies the option of being inside or out, and wherever this is in conflict with the state statutes, the Federal statutes must be followed." The New York state law prohibits any but election officers and voters from being within 150 feet of the booths. Here is a serious conflict, and one to deal with which will require the greatest prudence to avoid alarming consequences.
The extraordinary circular of Attorney-General Miller, in regard to the duties of United States marshals as supervisors of election, is intended as an intimidation of voters in New York, Connecticut, Delaware and West Virginia, where the most desperate measures are being resorted to in behalf of the Republicans. If Miller's interpretation of the existing laws is correct, there is no need for any Force bill, such as has been talked of, for the subjugation of southern electors, and any disclaimer of intending to pass one is useless. Indeed, Mr. Lodge, the author of that bill deliberately assured audience after audience in 1890, that the measure simply undertook to apply all over the country a law already on the statute books affecting large cities. Attorney-General Miller has thus adopted for the north and the "border" states, the construction that the supporters of the Election bill put upon the Supervisor's law as executed in the cities.
As we read General Miller's circular it virtually makes the supervisors a partisan board of review and returning board. It is proposed to carry the supervision considerably beyond mere observation, and the attorney-general is careful to remind the country that "the national government has the right to use physical force in any part of the United States to compel obedience to laws," etc. So, too, in reference to the deputies being inside the guards at the polling places, he declares the Federal law gives the deputies the option of being inside or out, and wherever this is in conflict with the state statutes, the Federal statutes must be followed." The New York state law prohibits any but election officers and voters from being within 150 feet of the booths. Here is a serious conflict, and one to deal with which will require the greatest prudence to avoid alarming consequences.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Legal Reform
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Election Supervision
Attorney General Miller
Force Bill
Federal Vs State Law
Republican Intimidation
Polling Places
United States Marshals
What entities or persons were involved?
Attorney General Miller
Mr. Lodge
Republicans
United States Marshals
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Attorney General Miller's Circular On Election Supervisors
Stance / Tone
Opposition To Federal Intimidation Of Voters In Northern States
Key Figures
Attorney General Miller
Mr. Lodge
Republicans
United States Marshals
Key Arguments
Miller's Circular Intimidates Voters In New York, Connecticut, Delaware, And West Virginia For Republicans
No Need For Force Bill If Miller's Interpretation Is Correct
Supervisors Act As Partisan Board Of Review
Federal Government Can Use Physical Force To Enforce Laws
Conflict Between Federal And New York State Laws On Polling Place Access