Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for National Gazette
Domestic News January 2, 1792

National Gazette

Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

What is this article about?

Letter from Western country gentleman to Philadelphia friend, Dec. 22, laments disastrous fate of small army, doubts Kentucky militia, urges raising pay for soldiers, proposes forts with settlements, Indian bribes, aggressive scouting to agitate and deter tribes, critiques treaties due to European rivals.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Extract of a letter from a gentleman in the Western country to his friend in Philadelphia, Dec. 22.

“The disastrous fate of our little army strikes a damp on every mind here, but when viewed in its natural consequences, is inexorably alarming—God knows what shall next be done!—We had formed some expectations from the Kentucky militia that were said to have gone out; but I believe there is nothing in that.

“There is no doubt but that the pay must be raised at least to six dollars, or no men worth having can be got. The plan of retaining of posts detached from the settlements and each other, I, from the beginning, thought a visionary one, unless connected with the idea of forming settlements round each of the posts. Donations of land ought to be made to the first families that would settle round them. Strong garrisons ought to be placed in them to defend them; bribe the Indians to sally out in case of an attack on the settlement, and keep themselves and settlers safe. Companies of the best woodsmen and marksmen, of honest pride but savage manners and as much Indians as possible, ought to be retained in the forts to prowl abroad among the Indians in parties of ten, twenty, and thirty; surprise their towns in all quarters, and kill and burn without distinction. This idea, so repugnant to the feelings of a civilized mind, and so shocking to a Philadelphian ear, I hesitate not to express, from a perfect conviction that it is necessary for our safety, and is the only shield we can place effectually before us. Their minds must be kept in agitation at home or we can never be safe. It is in vain, I think, to attempt to bind Indian nations by treaty. Where is our security in men without government. Ten men in every nation are sufficient to harass the frontiers incessantly. And we can find an hundred savages or ruffians in every county among ourselves that would do as much for gain if they had no fear of laws. If we had no European rivals we might do all by treaty, because their own interests would oblige them to be at peace for the sake of our trade, if they could not do without it. But till they have no other market than ours for European articles, it is idle to imagine that we can secure our peace from them but by force and fear. My scalping plan is liable to this objection, that if we have any friends among the Indians, our scouts, for the sake of gain, (for to make them vigilant they ought to have additional pay according to their services) would not hesitate much to attack our friends. There will therefore be a necessity to establish forts at Presque Isle, &c. and make a chain between the six nations and other Indians; this might secure the ostensible friendship of the six nations, which would be something, and if we had their real friendship, would keep them in countenance, and furnish them with protection against the others. In the forts near their friends they ought to have no scouting party, but a garrison and settlers. These garrisons would protect the settlers. The settlers would feed the garrison, and all together would form a good barrier for this country.”

What sub-type of article is it?

Indian Affairs Military

What keywords are associated?

Indian Affairs Military Defeat Western Frontier Defense Strategy Treaties Forts Scouting Parties Six Nations

Where did it happen?

Western Country

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Western Country

Event Date

Dec. 22

Outcome

disastrous fate of our little army

Event Details

Letter expresses alarm over army's defeat, skepticism about Kentucky militia, proposes raising soldier pay, establishing detached posts with settlements and land donations, strong garrisons, bribing friendly Indians, retaining woodsmen and marksmen for aggressive scouting parties to surprise and attack Indian towns, argues against treaties due to lack of government and European influences, suggests forts at Presque Isle to chain between Six Nations and others for security.

Are you sure?