Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Martinsburgh Gazette
Editorial June 19, 1823

Martinsburgh Gazette

Martinsburg, Berkeley County, West Virginia

What is this article about?

The editorial cautions against the US expanding its protective role over neighboring republics like Guatemala, emphasizing self-protection over Quixotic interventions. It justifies acquiring Florida for security but opposes further expansion, including Cuba, and urges Cuba to resist British control or declare independence to avoid future conflicts.

Clipping

OCR Quality

88% Good

Full Text

From the national eye :Beats :

Territorial Possessions.—In referring some time ago to the deputies from Guatemala, to the United States, we distinctly pointed out the inconveniences, and in fact danger, of making our country a kind of common protector or step-mother to all those neighboring republics and independencies, who desire to be guarded and shielded under what is considered the powerful mantle of the American Republic. Self protection is the first law of nature and of nations, & we can never agree with those sublimated editors, who consider that this country should neglect its legitimate and legal possessions to embark in a Quixotic attempt, to defend and support all the adjacent territories and dependencies. It is indeed very questionable, if with our present extent of territory, we are safe in swelling our national domains—The Floridas were absolutely necessary for the preservation of our southern frontier and had the treaty of transfer been negotiated at Madrid, we should have had Texas, a province which, from contiguity of situation, would have been of important value and service; apart, however, from these advantages, we did not require the Floridas as the means to improve or strengthen our Union, or add to our possessions—the peculiar situation of that territory between Georgia and Louisiana, the use made of the Floridas, by the enemy, during the late war, in organizing and fitting out expeditions against us, and exciting the Indians on our borders, rendered the possession of Florida more an object of national safety than of national ambition.—Equally erroneous is the impression of the British, that, in viewing their designs on Cuba with jealousy, we are governed by an anxiety to possess it ourselves. Cuba, to the U. States, would be an endless source of difficulty and expense. In the power of the British, it would be an object of distrust and lay the foundation of future wars; but in the possession of Spain, or independent, it would injure no power—create no apprehensions. Without regarding the clamors of those interested, it is the policy of this country to use every fair and proper mode to impress the people of Cuba, with the necessity of resisting the transfer of that Island to the British, or declaring themselves independent at once.

What sub-type of article is it?

Foreign Affairs Imperialism

What keywords are associated?

Territorial Possessions Self Protection Florida Acquisition Cuba Independence British Designs Neighboring Republics National Domains

What entities or persons were involved?

United States Guatemala British Spain Cuba Floridas Texas Indians

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Us Policy On Territorial Expansion And Protection Of Neighboring Republics

Stance / Tone

Cautionary Against Unnecessary Expansion And Intervention

Key Figures

United States Guatemala British Spain Cuba Floridas Texas Indians

Key Arguments

Self Protection Is The First Law Of Nature And Nations Us Should Not Neglect Its Own Possessions To Defend Adjacent Territories Florida Acquisition Was Necessary For Southern Frontier Security And To Counter Enemy Use During The Late War Texas Would Have Been Valuable If Acquired Earlier Cuba In Us Hands Would Cause Endless Difficulty And Expense Cuba Under British Control Would Lead To Distrust And Future Wars Cuba Should Remain With Spain Or Become Independent To Avoid Harming Other Powers Us Policy: Encourage Cubans To Resist British Transfer Or Declare Independence

Are you sure?