Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Alexandria Gazette & Daily Advertiser
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
On Friday, February 9, the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's judgment in Mechanics' Bank vs. Withers, ruling that an adjournment of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia's April term constituted the same term. The Bello Corrunes case, with Malaguamba as claimant, was argued by Mr. Winder for captors, Mr. Wheaton for salvors, and Mr. Webster for the claimant.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
Friday, February 9.
The judgment of the court below, in the case of the Mechanics' Bank vs. Withers, was affirmed. This case involved a mere question of practice under the local law of Virginia, whether the adjournment of the April term of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, from the 16th of May to the fourth Monday in June, was a continuation of the April term, or constituted a distinct term? This court determined that it was the same term.
The case of the Bello Corrunes, Malaguamba claimant, was argued by Mr. Winder for the captors, by Mr. Wheaton for the salvors, and by Mr. Webster for the claimant.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
District Of Columbia
Event Date
Friday, February 9.
Key Persons
Outcome
judgment affirmed in mechanics' bank vs. withers; bello corrunes case argued.
Event Details
The judgment of the court below, in the case of the Mechanics' Bank vs. Withers, was affirmed. This case involved a mere question of practice under the local law of Virginia, whether the adjournment of the April term of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, from the 16th of May to the fourth Monday in June, was a continuation of the April term, or constituted a distinct term? This court determined that it was the same term. The case of the Bello Corrunes, Malaguamba claimant, was argued by Mr. Winder for the captors, by Mr. Wheaton for the salvors, and by Mr. Webster for the claimant.