Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer
Domestic News September 24, 1896

The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer

Wheeling, Ohio County, West Virginia

What is this article about?

Senator John Sherman publishes a reply in a Cincinnati paper to William Jennings Bryan's charges about the 'Crime of '73,' defending the 1873 act ending silver dollar coinage as openly debated in Congress and the Treasury.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

SHERMAN REPLIES
To Bryan's Charge About the Alleged
Crime of '73.

CINCINNATI, Sept. 23.—A local paper publishes a signed article from Senator John Sherman dated Mansfield, O.,
in which he replies to Mr. Bryan and others who refer to the crime of '73. Senator Sherman says that many
pages of the Congressional Record
show indisputable proofs that the clause
in the act of 1873 stopping the coinage of the silver dollars was not surreptitiously and clandestinely passed through Congress. The senator reviews this history of that legislation, showing that
there was an unusually long agitation
not only in both branches of Congress
but also in the committees of both
houses, and also in the treasury department, before the bill was prepared.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Economic

What keywords are associated?

Sherman Reply Bryan Charge Crime Of 73 Silver Coinage 1873 Act Congressional Record

What entities or persons were involved?

Senator John Sherman Mr. Bryan

Where did it happen?

Cincinnati

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Cincinnati

Event Date

Sept. 23.

Key Persons

Senator John Sherman Mr. Bryan

Event Details

A local paper publishes a signed article from Senator John Sherman dated Mansfield, O., in which he replies to Mr. Bryan and others who refer to the crime of '73. Senator Sherman says that many pages of the Congressional Record show indisputable proofs that the clause in the act of 1873 stopping the coinage of the silver dollars was not surreptitiously and clandestinely passed through Congress. The senator reviews the history of that legislation, showing that there was an unusually long agitation not only in both branches of Congress but also in the committees of both houses, and also in the treasury department, before the bill was prepared.

Are you sure?