Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Martinsburgh Gazette
Editorial April 3, 1812

Martinsburgh Gazette

Martinsburg, Berkeley County, West Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial excerpts from the Baltimore Whig criticize the U.S. Executive's $50,000 payment to spy Henry as wasteful, contrasting it with the unmet needs of impoverished Revolutionary War veterans, and question if patriots like Warren and Montgomery would approve of such priorities.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

CURIOUS EXTRACTS

From the Baltimore Whig, a democratic paper.

"We had supposed that Henry had put our government in possession of more information, by a great deal, than it now appears he did."

"If our Executive gave 50,000 dollars for this superfluous proof, it was, we think, lavishing too much of the people's money on a spy for a whistle."

Extract of a letter from Washington.

"It is understood that the letter which purports to be a communication to Henry from Lord Liverpool, is written on paper bearing the water-mark of a manufacturer of paper in Philadelphia; so that Lord Liverpool must import his paper for official purposes from this country."

Question.--How many comfortable meals would 50,000 dollars have purchased for disabled and superannuated officers and soldiers of the revolution, who with their families, are now pining in want, and whose claims are barred by the statutes of limitation? Answer--500 old soldiers could have been comfortably fed for nine months.

Could Warren and Montgomery and other patriots, have foreseen that the time was to come, when their companions in arms would be treated with contumely and injustice, and the money of the country they were then purchasing at the price of their blood, be lavished on vile spies and traitors, would they not in all probability have been now living, or have died quietly in their beds?"

What sub-type of article is it?

Satire Partisan Politics Economic Policy

What keywords are associated?

Spy Scandal Government Waste Revolutionary Veterans Henry Affair Executive Criticism Veteran Support

What entities or persons were involved?

Henry Lord Liverpool Executive Baltimore Whig Warren Montgomery

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Criticism Of Government Spending On Spy Henry Versus Revolutionary War Veterans

Stance / Tone

Strongly Critical Of Executive Waste And Injustice To Veterans

Key Figures

Henry Lord Liverpool Executive Baltimore Whig Warren Montgomery

Key Arguments

Henry Provided Little Valuable Information To The Government Executive Wasted $50,000 Of Public Money On A Useless Spy The Purported Letter From Lord Liverpool Uses American Made Paper $50,000 Could Have Fed 500 Revolutionary War Veterans For Nine Months Veterans' Claims Are Barred By Statutes Of Limitation Patriots Like Warren And Montgomery Would Be Dismayed By Treatment Of Their Comrades And Misuse Of Funds On Spies

Are you sure?