Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 25, 1801
The New Hampshire Gazette
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
This editorial quotes Thomas Paine's critical views on the US Constitution from his letter to Washington, describing it as inconsistent and a copy of the British government. It questions Paine's recent complimentary letter to Jefferson celebrating republicanism's triumph under the same flawed document.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
MORE ABOUT THOMAS PAINE.
"Thomas Paine, in his letter to General Washington, says, "It was only to the absolute necessity of establishing some Federal authority, extending equally over all the states, that an instrument so inconsistent as the present Federal constitution is, obtained a suffrage." P. 4. "As to the point of consolidating the states into a Federal government, it so happens, that the proposition for that purpose came originally from myself. I proposed it in a letter to Chancellor Livingston in the Spring of the year 1782." p.5.
"I have always been opposed to the mode of refining government up to an individual, or what is called a single executive." Note, p. 5. "The federal constitution is a copy, not quite so base as the original, of the form of the British government." P. 7. "I declare myself opposed to several matters in the constitution, particularly to the manner in which, what is called the executive. is formed, and to the long duration of the Senate. and if I live to return to America, I will use all my endeavors to have them altered."p. 4. 5.
From the above extracts we learn clearly Thomas Paine's opinion of the present Constitution of the United States. It is inconsistent, a copy of the British government, but not quite so base. Thomas wishes for consolidation; for a plurality in the executive: there are several matters to which he cannot be reconciled, and if he lives to come over he will try to have them altered. But how is that, Thomas has lately sent a complimentary epistle to Mr. Jefferson "on the triumph of republicanism in the United States?" Is not the constitution to remain the same? Or is it now to be altered? If it remain the same, and almost as base as the British government, how in the name of the world, does "republicanism triumph?" These questions force themselves upon the mind, and it naturally looks out for some solution.
"Thomas Paine, in his letter to General Washington, says, "It was only to the absolute necessity of establishing some Federal authority, extending equally over all the states, that an instrument so inconsistent as the present Federal constitution is, obtained a suffrage." P. 4. "As to the point of consolidating the states into a Federal government, it so happens, that the proposition for that purpose came originally from myself. I proposed it in a letter to Chancellor Livingston in the Spring of the year 1782." p.5.
"I have always been opposed to the mode of refining government up to an individual, or what is called a single executive." Note, p. 5. "The federal constitution is a copy, not quite so base as the original, of the form of the British government." P. 7. "I declare myself opposed to several matters in the constitution, particularly to the manner in which, what is called the executive. is formed, and to the long duration of the Senate. and if I live to return to America, I will use all my endeavors to have them altered."p. 4. 5.
From the above extracts we learn clearly Thomas Paine's opinion of the present Constitution of the United States. It is inconsistent, a copy of the British government, but not quite so base. Thomas wishes for consolidation; for a plurality in the executive: there are several matters to which he cannot be reconciled, and if he lives to come over he will try to have them altered. But how is that, Thomas has lately sent a complimentary epistle to Mr. Jefferson "on the triumph of republicanism in the United States?" Is not the constitution to remain the same? Or is it now to be altered? If it remain the same, and almost as base as the British government, how in the name of the world, does "republicanism triumph?" These questions force themselves upon the mind, and it naturally looks out for some solution.
What sub-type of article is it?
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Thomas Paine
Us Constitution
Federal Government
Republicanism
British Government
Executive Power
What entities or persons were involved?
Thomas Paine
General Washington
Chancellor Livingston
Mr. Jefferson
British Government
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Thomas Paine's Opinions On The Us Constitution
Stance / Tone
Questioning And Critical Of Paine's Consistency
Key Figures
Thomas Paine
General Washington
Chancellor Livingston
Mr. Jefferson
British Government
Key Arguments
The Us Constitution Is Inconsistent And Obtained Suffrage Only Due To Necessity For Federal Authority.
Paine Proposed Consolidating States Into A Federal Government In 1782.
Paine Opposes A Single Executive And Prefers Plurality.
The Constitution Is A Copy Of The British Government, Though Not As Base.
Paine Opposes The Executive Formation And Senate Duration, Plans To Alter Them If He Returns.
Questions Paine's Praise For Republicanism's Triumph Under The Same Flawed Constitution.