Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe New York Journal, And Daily Patriotic Register
New York, New York County, New York
What is this article about?
Luther Martin writes to the Speaker of the House of Delegates defending his account of why New York delegates Yates and Lansing left the Constitutional Convention in July 1787, quoting their joint letter to Governor Clinton to counter accusations of lacking candor.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Speaker of the House of Delegates.
SIR,
I flatter myself the subject of this letter will be a sufficient apology for thus publicly addressing it to you, and through you to the other members of the house of delegates. It cannot yet have escaped your or their recollection, that when called upon as a servant of a free state to render an account of those transactions in which I had had a share in consequence of the trust reposed in me by that state, among other things, I informed them, "that some time in July, the hon. Mr. Yates and Mr. Lansing of New-York, left the convention—that they had uniformly opposed the system, and that I believe despairing of getting a proper one brought forward, or of rendering any real service, they returned no more." You cannot, sir, have forgot, for the incident was too remarkable not to have made some impression, that upon my giving this information, the zeal of one of my hon. colleagues, in favor of a system which I thought it my duty to oppose, impelled him to interrupt me, and in a manner which I am confident his zeal alone prevented him from being convinced was not the most delicate, to insinuate pretty strongly that the statement which I had given of the conduct of those gentlemen and their motives for not returning was not candid.
Those hon. members have officially given information on this subject by a joint letter to his excellency Governor Clinton—it is published.—Indulge me, sir, in giving an extract from it, that it may stand contrasted in the same page with the information I gave, and may convict me of the want of candor of which I was charged, if the charge was just—if it will not do that, then let it silence my accusers.
"Thus circumstanced, under these impressions, to have hesitated would have been to be culpable—We therefore gave the principles of the constitution, which has received the sanction of a majority of the convention, our decided and unreserved dissent. We were not present at the completion of the new constitution, but before we left the convention, its principles were so well established as to convince us, that no alteration was to be expected to conform it to our ideas of expediency and safety. A persuasion that our further attendance would be fruitless and unavailing rendered us less solicitous to return."
These, sir, are their words—On these I shall make no comment.—I wish not to wound the feelings of any person, I only wish to convince.
I have the honor to remain,
With the utmost respect,
Your very obedient servant,
LUTHER MARTIN
Baltimore, Jan. 27, 1788.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Letter to Editor Details
Author
Luther Martin
Recipient
To The Hon. Thomas Cockly Deye, Speaker Of The House Of Delegates
Main Argument
luther martin defends the candor of his previous statement regarding the departure of new york delegates yates and lansing from the constitutional convention by quoting their own published letter to governor clinton, which aligns with his account and should silence his accusers.
Notable Details