Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Letter to Editor
February 16, 1831
Daily Richmond Whig
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
A citizen praises the Whig for promoting the enclosures system and proposes strategies to build public opinion and legislative support, including county courts adopting it or appointing committees to investigate and report to the assembly.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
For the Whig.
For your liberality in publishing various essays in favor of the proposed system of enclosures, and for the manner in which you have invited public attention to that important subject, you deserve the thanks of all those who favour the system, and those who think it worthy of public attention and investigation. But it is difficult to get the public mind to take it into consideration, and it is hopeless to expect the members of Assembly to act definitely and decisively on that or any other subject, before the expression as well as formation of public opinion. Now, sirs, what is to be done? Shall the friends of this system "give it up," or devise means of bringing it more directly before the public, and of eliciting an expression of its opinion? and how can these objects be accomplished?
What objection could there be to the passage of a law allowing the court of each county, a majority of the magistrates being present, to adopt the system as to that county, if they believe it would promote the general interests of its citizens? The county benches are composed of respectable, experienced and intelligent citizens; whose interests, in this respect, are identified and inseparable from those of the county at large; and there is a moral certainty, that the court would not adopt the system against the wish of a respectable minority. Indeed it is rather to be apprehended that the court may be inclined to err on the other side: by requiring more unanimity of sentiment than can be expected on any important subject, which is both new and untried.
But if the above measure be thought too bold, take another plan. Let the Assembly by resolution or law request the county courts, respectively, to appoint three or more intelligent citizens to investigate the subject, examine into the probable operation of such a law, its advantages and disadvantages, gather the opinions of the people and report to the court thereon, and if the court, a majority being present, adopt the views of the report, let it be sent to the Governor or Auditor to be laid before the next Assembly. Perhaps this course is preferable, as it would embrace the State at large, and would ensure a full and dispassionate examination of the subject. The next Assembly would then be prepared to act advisedly on the matter, and may reject, adopt or modify it at pleasure.
A CITIZEN.
For your liberality in publishing various essays in favor of the proposed system of enclosures, and for the manner in which you have invited public attention to that important subject, you deserve the thanks of all those who favour the system, and those who think it worthy of public attention and investigation. But it is difficult to get the public mind to take it into consideration, and it is hopeless to expect the members of Assembly to act definitely and decisively on that or any other subject, before the expression as well as formation of public opinion. Now, sirs, what is to be done? Shall the friends of this system "give it up," or devise means of bringing it more directly before the public, and of eliciting an expression of its opinion? and how can these objects be accomplished?
What objection could there be to the passage of a law allowing the court of each county, a majority of the magistrates being present, to adopt the system as to that county, if they believe it would promote the general interests of its citizens? The county benches are composed of respectable, experienced and intelligent citizens; whose interests, in this respect, are identified and inseparable from those of the county at large; and there is a moral certainty, that the court would not adopt the system against the wish of a respectable minority. Indeed it is rather to be apprehended that the court may be inclined to err on the other side: by requiring more unanimity of sentiment than can be expected on any important subject, which is both new and untried.
But if the above measure be thought too bold, take another plan. Let the Assembly by resolution or law request the county courts, respectively, to appoint three or more intelligent citizens to investigate the subject, examine into the probable operation of such a law, its advantages and disadvantages, gather the opinions of the people and report to the court thereon, and if the court, a majority being present, adopt the views of the report, let it be sent to the Governor or Auditor to be laid before the next Assembly. Perhaps this course is preferable, as it would embrace the State at large, and would ensure a full and dispassionate examination of the subject. The next Assembly would then be prepared to act advisedly on the matter, and may reject, adopt or modify it at pleasure.
A CITIZEN.
What sub-type of article is it?
Persuasive
Informative
Political
What themes does it cover?
Agriculture
Economic Policy
Politics
What keywords are associated?
Enclosures System
Public Opinion
County Courts
Assembly Action
Agricultural Reform
What entities or persons were involved?
A Citizen.
For The Whig.
Letter to Editor Details
Author
A Citizen.
Recipient
For The Whig.
Main Argument
the letter urges action to promote the enclosures system by involving county courts to adopt it or investigate and report, thereby forming public opinion to influence the assembly's decision.
Notable Details
Thanks The Whig For Publishing Pro Enclosures Essays
Suggests Law For County Courts To Adopt System
Alternative: Appoint Investigators To Report To Assembly