Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Watchman And Southron
Commercial October 12, 1927

The Watchman And Southron

Sumter, Sumter County, South Carolina

What is this article about?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Sinclair in the Teapot Dome oil lease case, affirming its cancellation due to fraud and corruption, consistent with the Pan-American decision on Elk Hill naval reserve leases.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Sinclair Loses Teapot Dome Case

Washington, Oct. 10.—(AP)—Sinclair today lost the Teapot Dome oil case in supreme court.

The court opinion in the case which was argued before the summer recess was read by Associate Justice Butler. Its effect was to affirm the decision of the eighth circuit court of appeals, rendered by Judge Kenyon, cancelling the lease and contract on the ground of fraud and corruption.

The supreme court held that the Teapot Dome lease question was controlled by its recent decision in the Pan-American cases brought by Edward I. Doheny, involving leases and contracts on the Elk Hill naval reserve in California which the court ordered cancelled.

What sub-type of article is it?

Policy Economic

What keywords are associated?

Teapot Dome Supreme Court Oil Lease Fraud Corruption Sinclair Case

What entities or persons were involved?

Sinclair Associate Justice Butler Judge Kenyon Edward I. Doheny

Where did it happen?

Washington

Commercial Details

Location

Washington

Event Date

Oct. 10.

Commodities

Oil

Key Figures

Sinclair Associate Justice Butler Judge Kenyon Edward I. Doheny

Notable Details

  • affirm decision of eighth circuit court of appeals cancelling lease and contract on ground of fraud and corruption
  • teapot dome lease controlled by decision in pan-american cases involving leases on elk hill naval reserve in california ordered cancelled

Are you sure?