Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for New Hampshire Statesman
Editorial November 20, 1868

New Hampshire Statesman

Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

Editorial mocks Democratic newspapers' repeated unfulfilled predictions of victory after Republican wins in 1860, 1864, and 1868 elections, highlighting Grant's triumph with strong Western state support and criticizing Democratic leadership failures.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

To succeed on Review. An old and now deceased Merrimack County lawyer, not remarkable for his success before juries, kept up the courage of his clients by saying they would succeed on review of the case. Democratic journals have fallen into the same habit. After the first election of Lincoln the Martyr, they said to the rank and file, "This election is a mere accident. Wait until 1864, and the Democratic party will make an end of the Republicans." But in 1864 they found that the people needed the Republican party, to carry on the war and put down forever the Democratic doctrine that States could secede from the Union. Beaten then, Democratic journals said the party could not be expected to succeed, when eleven States took no part in the election. Wait patiently, through this one term, and the country, weary of Radicalism and the "Rump Congress," will restore the Democratic party as the only agent capable of averting national destruction.

Well, four years more have passed and Democratic prophecies are unfulfilled. The Republicans have triumphed by a quarter of a million majority of the popular vote, and Grant is to have 214 electoral votes, with New-York carried for Seymour by fraud, and at least two Southern States by terror. But in the face of these facts, Democratic journals hold out the assurance that the party will succeed "on review."

The ten Western States—Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Minnesota, Kansas, and Nebraska—gave a majority of 285,000 for Gen. Grant. These States, which contain more than one third of the population of the Union, voted solid against Seymour and Pendletonianism.

The Patriot complains that its party had no organization at the recent election. The probability is that the Chairman of their Committee did the best he could in a failing cause. But what shall be said of Mr. Belmont, the chairman of their National Committee. He did not even vote for Seymour or McClellan.

The Democrats had great expectations from Seymour's western excursion. The N. Y. World, amongst other big head-lines to an account of his progress, had these: "Triumphal Progress of the next President of the United States; his Journey from Columbus; Magnificent Reception at Pittsburg."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

1868 Election Grant Victory Democratic Defeat Partisan Predictions Western States Seymour Campaign

What entities or persons were involved?

Lincoln Grant Seymour Pendleton Belmont Mcclellan Democratic Party Republican Party

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Democratic Predictions Of Future Victory After 1868 Election Loss

Stance / Tone

Mocking And Pro Republican

Key Figures

Lincoln Grant Seymour Pendleton Belmont Mcclellan Democratic Party Republican Party

Key Arguments

Democratic Journals Repeatedly Predict Victory On 'Review' After Losses In 1860, 1864, And 1868 Republicans Triumphed In 1868 With 250,000 Popular Vote Majority And 214 Electoral Votes Western States Gave Grant 285,000 Majority Seymour's New York Win By Fraud, Southern States By Terror Democratic National Chairman Belmont Did Not Vote For Candidates Overhyped Expectations From Seymour's Western Tour

Are you sure?