Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 18, 1958
The Camas Hot Springs Exchange
Hot Springs, Camas, Sanders County, Montana
What is this article about?
Humorous editorial from The Christian Science Monitor critiques proposals for a U.S. national flower, including corn tassel by Sen. Douglas and Rep. Judd, and suggests the dandelion as a practical, vested-interest-free option for suburban lawns.
OCR Quality
88%
Good
Full Text
For the National Flower
Illinois Senator Paul H. Douglas
is a bold and persistent man. A
year ago he and Representative
Walter H. Judd of Minnesota intro-
duced a bill to name the corn tassel
the national flower. Last month he
staged a corn-tassel luncheon in
the Senate dining room.
We number ourselves among the
innocent of an older generation
which grew up thinking the golden
rod was already it. The 1915 edition
of a well-known encyclopedia says
"Many botanists and flower lovers
claim for the goldenrod the distinc-
tion of being called the national
flower." We were disillusioned three
or four years ago when a couple of
our congresswomen (bless 'em) in-
troduced legislation to name the
rose. It got some support, but ended
"withering on the vine".
All such have withered because,
it is said, every proposed
flower has a vested interest behind
it. And this, understandably, scares
congressmen. It also inspires a wag
to propose poison ivy as vested-in-
terest free.
Lacking cynicism of the wag but
possessed with some of Senator
Douglas' rashness, we are suggest-
ing the dandelion. Think of the
boon to the suburbanite! (And A-
merica is going suburban). He
could, with an easy conscience, let
the natural flower flourish in his
lawn. Dandelions are quite pretty
—look at one at a time. And the
leaves properly cooked, make good
eating.
—The Christian Science Monitor
Illinois Senator Paul H. Douglas
is a bold and persistent man. A
year ago he and Representative
Walter H. Judd of Minnesota intro-
duced a bill to name the corn tassel
the national flower. Last month he
staged a corn-tassel luncheon in
the Senate dining room.
We number ourselves among the
innocent of an older generation
which grew up thinking the golden
rod was already it. The 1915 edition
of a well-known encyclopedia says
"Many botanists and flower lovers
claim for the goldenrod the distinc-
tion of being called the national
flower." We were disillusioned three
or four years ago when a couple of
our congresswomen (bless 'em) in-
troduced legislation to name the
rose. It got some support, but ended
"withering on the vine".
All such have withered because,
it is said, every proposed
flower has a vested interest behind
it. And this, understandably, scares
congressmen. It also inspires a wag
to propose poison ivy as vested-in-
terest free.
Lacking cynicism of the wag but
possessed with some of Senator
Douglas' rashness, we are suggest-
ing the dandelion. Think of the
boon to the suburbanite! (And A-
merica is going suburban). He
could, with an easy conscience, let
the natural flower flourish in his
lawn. Dandelions are quite pretty
—look at one at a time. And the
leaves properly cooked, make good
eating.
—The Christian Science Monitor
What sub-type of article is it?
Satire
What keywords are associated?
National Flower
Corn Tassel
Goldenrod
Dandelion
Vested Interests
Senator Douglas
What entities or persons were involved?
Paul H. Douglas
Walter H. Judd
Congresswomen
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Proposal For National Flower
Stance / Tone
Humorous Suggestion Of Dandelion
Key Figures
Paul H. Douglas
Walter H. Judd
Congresswomen
Key Arguments
Senator Douglas And Representative Judd Proposed Corn Tassel As National Flower
Goldenrod Traditionally Viewed As National Flower By Some
Rose Proposal By Congresswomen Failed
Proposals Deterred By Vested Interests
Poison Ivy Suggested Satirically As Unbiased
Dandelion Proposed As Practical For Suburbanites