Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
April 12, 1824
New Hampshire Statesman
Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
Editorial praises Senator Hayne's speech as a strong rebuttal to the caucus system for electing President and Vice President, urging resistance to congressional interference in popular suffrage. Contrasts Hayne's patriotism with Senator Holmes' partisanship.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Mr. Hayne's Speech.—The reader will find, the Speech of Mr. Hayne, (of S.C.) which we insert this evening, an able and conclusive reply to all that was urged in the senate in favour of the caucus system, and to all that has or can be urged elsewhere in extenuation of scheme for taking the election of President and Vice President from the people and contriving for the appointment of those officers by the members of congress, in what they call their "unofficial capacity." If the free people of this country would retain their constitutional right of electing these high officers, they must now resist with firmness and unanimity, the daring attempt of a small minority of congress, who presuming upon their official stations, have adopted this scheme to counteract and overawe the general voice.
Let it not be forgotten that it is by the friends and advocates of this usurping system that the people of this state have been deprived of the right of suffrage in the choice of Presidential electors. This is one of the traits of the caucus system, a system based upon intrigue and management, and which recognizes party to the exclusion of principle.
The clear and sound reasoning, and the patriotic and national sentiment infused into the speech of Mr. Hayne, will, we hope, secure for it an attentive reading in all parts of the country. What a contrast between the independent and liberal remarks of this gentleman and the fire and fury of that willing subject of more than one party, Mr. Senator Holmes of Maine!
Let it not be forgotten that it is by the friends and advocates of this usurping system that the people of this state have been deprived of the right of suffrage in the choice of Presidential electors. This is one of the traits of the caucus system, a system based upon intrigue and management, and which recognizes party to the exclusion of principle.
The clear and sound reasoning, and the patriotic and national sentiment infused into the speech of Mr. Hayne, will, we hope, secure for it an attentive reading in all parts of the country. What a contrast between the independent and liberal remarks of this gentleman and the fire and fury of that willing subject of more than one party, Mr. Senator Holmes of Maine!
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
Suffrage
What keywords are associated?
Caucus System
Presidential Election
Suffrage
Hayne Speech
Congressional Interference
Popular Rights
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Hayne (S.C.)
Mr. Senator Holmes Of Maine
Congress
People Of This State
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition To Caucus System In Presidential Elections
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Popular Election And Critical Of Congressional Caucus
Key Figures
Mr. Hayne (S.C.)
Mr. Senator Holmes Of Maine
Congress
People Of This State
Key Arguments
Hayne's Speech Conclusively Replies To Arguments For Caucus System
Caucus Scheme Takes Election From People And Gives To Congress In Unofficial Capacity
People Must Resist To Retain Constitutional Right To Elect President And Vice President
Caucus Advocates Deprived State Of Suffrage In Choosing Electors
Caucus Based On Intrigue, Management, And Party Over Principle
Hayne's Speech Shows Patriotic National Sentiment