Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Caledonian
Editorial August 19, 1844

The Caledonian

Saint Johnsbury, Caledonia County, Vermont

What is this article about?

This editorial defends Whig leader Henry Clay against Democratic (Loco) accusations that Whigs would permit British seizure of Texas from Mexico. It quotes Clay's letter asserting U.S. duty to resist European ambitions on Texas, even by force if necessary.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

THE TEXAS QUESTION.

The chief argument used by the Locos, why Texas should be annexed to the union, "now or never," is that Great Britain wants her; and they covertly insinuate, if they do not openly charge, that Mr. Clay and the Whigs are willing to stand silently by and see Texas wrested from Mexico by England. Whenever this assertion is made, let the Whigs give it a flat contradiction "from the Record." Here is what Mr. Clay says in his admirable Letter on the Annexation project:

"If any European nation entertains any ambitious design upon Texas, such as that of colonizing her, or in any way subjecting her, I should regard it as the imperative duty of the Government of the United States, to oppose such designs by the most firm and determined resistance, to the extent, if necessary, of APPEALING TO ARMS."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Foreign Affairs

What keywords are associated?

Texas Annexation Whig Defense Henry Clay British Influence European Designs Us Resistance

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Clay Whigs Locos Great Britain Texas Mexico United States

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Whig Stance On Texas Annexation Against British Influence

Stance / Tone

Defensive And Supportive Of Henry Clay's Firm Opposition To European Designs On Texas

Key Figures

Mr. Clay Whigs Locos Great Britain Texas Mexico United States

Key Arguments

Locos Claim Britain Wants Texas And Whigs Would Allow It Whigs Should Contradict This Using Clay's Record Clay Views European Colonization Of Texas As A Threat Requiring U.S. Resistance, Potentially By Arms

Are you sure?