Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Camas Hot Springs Exchange
Domestic News February 28, 1957

The Camas Hot Springs Exchange

Hot Springs, Camas, Sanders County, Montana

What is this article about?

Congressman Metcalf questioned Air Force official G. S. Robinson at a House Interior Committee hearing about the clarity of Montana's game law after fines were imposed on out-of-state military personnel for falsely claiming residency to obtain hunting licenses. Robinson agreed the law is straightforward, and the Air Force committed to educating personnel on state laws.

Clipping

OCR Quality

100% Excellent

Full Text

There was general agreement at a recent hearing that Montana's game law isn't "tricky" - that it's clear enough for a colonel to understand.

Agreement was reached following a series of questions put by Congressman Metcalf to G. S. Robinson, a special assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force appearing before the House Interior Committee.

Metcalf's questions grew out of fines imposed last fall on members of three hunting parties of out-of-state military men for falsely swearing that they were Montana residents in order to buy resident big game hunting licenses.

One of the parties was made up of five Air Force officers, who paid $350 each after their arrest. Commenting on this case, the Air Force Times said Montana laws was "tricky".

The Air Force said the officers got a bum steer in correspondence "with the proper officials in Montana" on requirements for a resident's license.

A member of the Montana Fish and Game Commission says the officers "never at any time wrote to anyone in our Game Department."

This is background to Robinson's statement that the Air Force is making sure its personnel are up-to-date on state hunting and fishing law.

At this point Metcalf picked him up. After saying he was happy to have the policy statement, Metcalf read Robinson the Montana resident law.

"In your opinion, is that a tricky requirement?" Metcalf asked.

"From what you have read, it was quite understandable to me," Robinson replied. "I do not see anything tricky about it."

"Could a colonel, lieutenant colonel, or a captain in the Air Force be deceived by that requirement?" Metcalf asked.

"I do not see how myself," was the reply. "You ask me a frank question. I would say no."

Metcalf noted that the application form carries the question: "Have you continuously resided in Montana for the past six months?", and that the Air Force officers, like the Navy men in the other two parties, had answered "Yes".

Metcalf said he realizes that both enlisted men and officers "are underpaid", expressed his willingness to vote for a pay increase, but he was disappointed that, in correspondence with the Montana Congressional delegation, the Defense Department apparently "would condone the fact that men would come in and perjure themselves in order to save a little over a hundred dollars."

Congressman Rhodes of Arizona, like Metcalf a member of the Interior Committee, noted that during World War II officers were court-martialed for signing false affidavits.

"I just wonder if the Service is getting a little lax on keeping up the quality of its officers and gentlemen," Rhodes said.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Legal Or Court Crime

What keywords are associated?

Montana Game Law Hunting Licenses Air Force Officers Fines Congressional Hearing Perjury

What entities or persons were involved?

Congressman Metcalf G. S. Robinson Congressman Rhodes Of Arizona

Where did it happen?

Montana

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Montana

Event Date

Recent Hearing

Key Persons

Congressman Metcalf G. S. Robinson Congressman Rhodes Of Arizona

Outcome

fines of $350 each imposed on five air force officers for falsely swearing montana residency; air force to ensure personnel are informed on state hunting laws

Event Details

At a House Interior Committee hearing, Congressman Metcalf questioned G. S. Robinson on Montana's resident hunting license requirements following fines on out-of-state military men, including five Air Force officers, for perjury. Robinson stated the law is clear and not tricky. Background involved disputed correspondence with Montana officials. Metcalf expressed disappointment in the Defense Department's stance, and Rhodes noted past strict enforcement.

Are you sure?