Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Recorder
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
This editorial criticizes corruption in the federal post-office and Virginia assembly, highlighting robberies, overpayment for public printing as theft, and misconduct by officials like Brockenborough and Hay, questioning re-election of such figures.
Merged-components note: Merged continuation of editorial response to subscriber complaints about post-office issues and commentary on assembly conduct; relabeled first part from notice to editorial.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Brockenborough did not go to judge Roan, as we had stated. M Rae and Hay only went. Brockenborough even affects to disapprove of Hay's conduct.
He has quite as much reason to condemn his own. He had the audacity to interrupt the reading of a memorial; a thing before unheard of in the assembly. He was an associate in that act of theft, by which the majority stole fifteen hundred dollars from their constituents, to be made a present of to the public printer. For what other or better than the blackest and most downright theft can you term it, to pay twenty-seven hundred dollars for a piece of work, when two responsible and reputable printers in Richmond had separately offered to do the same thing for twelve hundred? The assembly did this because they were playing with the money of the people.
To that people, we submit whether it is a crime to cheat them, and whether they think that such fellows should be sent back to cheat them a second time?
It is very true that fifteen hundred dollars are not a great sum for a state like this to lose. But mind that your treasury is often quite empty. When you are going to entrust a man with ten thousand pounds, it is very interesting to learn that he has been detected in stealing five shillings. This shews you what he is, and puts you on your guard.
In the same manner, the robbery of the fifteen hundred dollars shews how the assembly were likely to behave in the armory business, and how the executive council came to give citizen Loo a fee of seven hundred dollars, when the whole inside furniture of his skull was not worth half that sum!
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Corruption In Post Office And Assembly Over Public Printing And Fees
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical And Accusatory Of Government Officials
Key Figures
Key Arguments