Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Rhode Island Republican
Letter to Editor October 23, 1802

Rhode Island Republican

Newport, Newport County, Rhode Island

What is this article about?

In Newport, October 21, 1802, Jacob Richardson counters Cleland Kinlock's published deposition by detailing their private conversations about letters purportedly written by Rutledge in a disguised hand, delivered by a white girl, and accusations against Mr. Ellery, aiming to clarify the truth for the public.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Newport, Oct. 21st 1802.

Mr. Editor,

Cleland Kinlock having thought proper to publish his Deposition, relative to certain conversations had between us, on the evening of the 10th instant and the two following mornings; and having therein mentioned circumstances new to me, and omitted others which made part of the conversations; and no third person having been present, who can testify to what was said, I desire you to publish my statement, handed herewith; in order that the Public may be posed of the truth.

ON the 10th instant, in the evening. Cleland Kinlock, of Charleston, South-Carolina, accosted me in the street, near the Theatre, and observed, that there were matters mentioned in my Deposition, about which he imagined I could give him some information. I replied to Mr. Kinlock, that I had always viewed him as a gentleman, and would expect that what I might disclose to him would be received in confidence. He assured me that it should. "He then asked me, whether the Girl who brought the Letters was Phyllis or a white girl? I told him she was a white girl. He asked me if I thought I could identify the girl, if I saw her? I told him it was possible that I could. He then enquired whether I thought the superscription of the Letter was in Rutledge's hand? I answered that I thought it was, and that I had seen letters before in the same disguised hand, which I believed to be written by him, which I mentioned; induced to this from the consideration that Mr. Kinlock had ever appeared to be a man of honor, and, as such, would wish to be made acquainted with every fact concerning the character of his friend, for the regulation of his own conduct towards him. He questioned my accuracy in discerning the difference of hand-writing. I mentioned to him instances which I thought convincing. But said Mr. Kinlock, my friend has come forward and sworn that he did not write the Letters; how shall I get rid of that? I replied, that if his friend would do the one act, he might readily do the other.— He then adverted again to the girl, and I laughing, observed, that there could be no mischief without the aid of some female. Mr. Kinlock expressing some surprise at my father's coming forward, and at my deposing, I made him acquainted with circumstances which took place in the early part of the business; and explaining to him what I thought to have been very improper in the defence of Rutledge; thus endeavored to convince him, that it was necessary we should come out. I mentioned to him, that circumstances untrue had been published under Oath that Mr. Ellery was charged falsely, and it was proper to let the truth out.—Mr. Kinlock appeared much irritated against Mr. Ellery—asked if he would fight—said that he would not dare to go to Congress—observed that the laws were strict here; but not so to the Southward. He proposed to bring the Girl to me in the morning. The idea caused another smile. I consented, tho' I conceived it to be idle. He then proposed taking the Girl to Ben. Hazard's office in the morning. I laughed again, and told Mr. Kinlock I had little to do with the Girls, or something to that effect: and we parted for the night.—The next morning, Kinlock came again, and asked if he might speak a word with me. I gave the opportunity, and he then said, "Mrs. Rutledge says that no white Girl lived with her at that time." Again the morning following, he came to the office and informed me, that there was a Girl at Stephen Northam's, and he, Mr. Northam, would wait upon her to the office, if I would see her. I told him I would not see his Girl either at Northam's, or Ben. Hazard's office, or any where else: that I had conversed with him from regard to his character; believing that I could convince him that his friend was guilty, and thinking him to be a gentleman; but that he did not act a genteel part, and I should not have any thing more to say to him upon the object. Many other things were introduced, which I do not mention, as Mr. Kinlock has thought fit to omit almost the whole of our conversations, selecting only particular parts.

JACOB RICHARDSON, jun.

What sub-type of article is it?

Persuasive Informative Investigative

What themes does it cover?

Crime Punishment Politics Press Freedom

What keywords are associated?

Deposition Dispute Rutledge Letters Handwriting Identification White Girl Messenger Cleland Kinlock Jacob Richardson Mr Ellery Newport Conversations

What entities or persons were involved?

Jacob Richardson, Jun. Mr. Editor

Letter to Editor Details

Author

Jacob Richardson, Jun.

Recipient

Mr. Editor

Main Argument

jacob richardson provides his detailed account of conversations with cleland kinlock to counter kinlock's selective deposition, asserting the truth about rutledge's involvement in writing disguised letters delivered by a white girl and false charges against mr. ellery.

Notable Details

Conversations About Identifying A White Girl Messenger Dispute Over Rutledge's Handwriting On Letter Superscription Kinlock's Irritation Toward Mr. Ellery And Suggestions Of Confrontation Offers To Bring The Girl To Richardson Or Hazard's Office

Are you sure?