Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 2, 1835
South Branch Intelligencer
Romney, Hampshire County, West Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial from National Gazette encourages Webster supporters not to be discouraged by recent Connecticut and Rhode Island election losses, attributing them to local party divisions over issues like Masonry and anti-slavery, asserting Webster would win majorities if directly presented.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
From the National Gazette.
It is represented to us from very respectable sources, that the results of the recent elections in Connecticut and Rhode Island should not produce discouragement among the good citizens of any State who prefer Mr. Webster as a candidate for the office of President. Those results have been occasioned by local party divisions which, it is affirmed, would cease, or be inoperative in the question of the adoption or rejection of the first statesman and chief boast of New England, when presented solely and finally to the New England communities. It is still thought that he would obtain the suffrages of a large majority in both Connecticut and Rhode Island. The case of the late elections is quaintly explained as follows in a letter from Providence to the Boston Courier:
"Here, with every thing at our command, and with the ability to succeed, we have suffered shame and disgrace, because many of our party stopped by the roadside to quarrel about masonry, anti-masonry, anti-slavery, anti-brandy, gin and cold water, orthodoxy, heterodoxy, Fanny Wright, Belzebub, and railroads. Thus we quarrelled split and divided; the well organized forces of the administration marched up in the mean time and carried all before them. We have thus lost our Senator and the State beside."
It is represented to us from very respectable sources, that the results of the recent elections in Connecticut and Rhode Island should not produce discouragement among the good citizens of any State who prefer Mr. Webster as a candidate for the office of President. Those results have been occasioned by local party divisions which, it is affirmed, would cease, or be inoperative in the question of the adoption or rejection of the first statesman and chief boast of New England, when presented solely and finally to the New England communities. It is still thought that he would obtain the suffrages of a large majority in both Connecticut and Rhode Island. The case of the late elections is quaintly explained as follows in a letter from Providence to the Boston Courier:
"Here, with every thing at our command, and with the ability to succeed, we have suffered shame and disgrace, because many of our party stopped by the roadside to quarrel about masonry, anti-masonry, anti-slavery, anti-brandy, gin and cold water, orthodoxy, heterodoxy, Fanny Wright, Belzebub, and railroads. Thus we quarrelled split and divided; the well organized forces of the administration marched up in the mean time and carried all before them. We have thus lost our Senator and the State beside."
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Webster Candidacy
Election Results
Party Divisions
Connecticut
Rhode Island
New England Politics
Anti Masonry
Anti Slavery
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Webster
Connecticut
Rhode Island
New England
Administration
Fanny Wright
Belzebub
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Support For Daniel Webster's Presidential Candidacy Despite Election Setbacks
Stance / Tone
Optimistic And Encouraging
Key Figures
Mr. Webster
Connecticut
Rhode Island
New England
Administration
Fanny Wright
Belzebub
Key Arguments
Recent Election Losses In Connecticut And Rhode Island Due To Local Party Divisions
Divisions Would Not Affect Support For Webster As Presidential Candidate
Webster Would Win Large Majorities In Both States If Presented Directly
Internal Quarrels Over Masonry, Anti Slavery, Temperance, Religion, And Other Issues Led To Defeat
Administration's Organized Forces Capitalized On Divisions To Win